Hi, On 06/10/2016 09:53, Alessandro Lai wrote: > Maybe the aim of this PSR should be a test suite (or at least a data > provider of common and edge cases for tests) instead of an interface: if > your escaper pass all the tests, it's PSR-x compliant. > > This could be a really good standard, which any implementer can look up > to to see if its implementation is up to the task.
Still, I don't think it's a suitable goal for a PSR. We'd be defining the output of an implementation, which is more or less like providing one. What would be the benefit? Cheers -- Matteo Beccati Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/72db76f6-f790-fa4e-3b09-f901221f7027%40beccati.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
