I agree with Alessandro. Since this seems a pretty controversial point, I would drop it, in favor of continuing the discussion into a new separate PSR, or maybe the "add stuff in the container" PSR. PSR-11 is just a stepping stone for everything in this area, so I would prefer to drop it and push it to approval.
Il giorno giovedì 17 novembre 2016 12:52:29 UTC+1, Alessandro Pellizzari ha scritto: > > On 17/11/2016 11:29, David Négrier wrote: > > > I know some of you have doubts about this part of the PSR, so the first > > thing might be to decide whether we want to keep it or not. If we decide > > to keep it, I'm sure there are plenty of things we can do to improve the > > wording :) > > I see the advantages of using delegate containers (I use them daily), > but honestly I don't think they should go in this PSR. > > PSR-11 is focused on getting things from a container, and delegates are > completely transparent from this POV. > > As long as a Container implements get() it can become a delegate of a > (possibly) more powerful Container that implements delegation. > > I think it would be better in a "Container creation and configuration" > PSR. > > Bye. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/59576a50-0bbe-4901-ae45-c0a4d98a9484%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
