I have neither claimed that you cannot nor that you will not be objective – 
do not try to read it into my comment.

Furthermore, do not try to downplay the Sponsor's role to a WG member with 
some administration tasks.
>From the fig-standards/bylaws/001-mission-and-structure.md 
<https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/blob/49b93d55188dadbb09fd7147a62cf5dab925fdea/bylaws/001-mission-and-structure.md>
:

*Sponsor*
> A PSR *must be sponsored by a member of the Core Committee*. […] *they 
> provide a level of oversight on the PSR's drafting on behalf of the Core 
> Committee*, […]
>
 

> *The Core Committee*
> […] The Core Committee is responsible for ensuring a high level of quality 
> and consistency amongst all published specifications, and that all relevant 
> perspectives and use cases are given due consideration.
> […] *Core Committee members are expected to consider the impact of their 
> actions on the PHP ecosystem as a whole when acting in their capacity as a 
> Core Committee member*


Sorry Matthew, honestly, I cannot remember one relevant comment off the 
cuff, where you have considered the impact of PSR-15 on a middleware 
framework other than your own. IMO that is permissible for an arbitrary WG 
member, but not for the Sponsor.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP 
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/01ff1d6f-7c67-446a-8328-152e9845e8c2%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to