This is, frankly, a relief. i hope this will open more discussion. i think there have been several well informed and reasonable responses (by others) that should be considered during this new draft period. Directly confronting the poll-result origins of the original standards, filling in gaps, settling inconsistencies...
Anyway, i'm grateful for this course of action. If there's some way i can contribute, i welcome the opportunity. -joe t. On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 12:51:43 UTC-4, Chris Tankersley wrote: > > Hello FIG! > > The working group for PSR-12 has decided to move the PSR back into draft > status, as per a meeting of the PSR-12 working group that was done on May > 3rd. The group has decided that there are some additional changes that need > to be made to the spec, which necessitates the PSR being moved back to > Draft status. > > There are some questions with regards to parenthesis and language > constructs which need to be addressed. A few other PRs were talked about > that dealt with what we feel are personal preferences, and we want to try > to avoid adding them during this new draft phase. A few other areas have > been deemed to need additional examples and clarifications. > > As the Sponsor, I'm formally moving the PSR back into Draft status. > > - Chris Tankersley and PSR-12 working group > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/ffd8daf9-0b05-4580-b2bf-c2753b79652a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
