Ralf and I talked off list, and he's going to take point as Maintainer for log-util.
I will call an Approval Vote early next week to confirm him. If someone wants to fight him for the job, step forward now and we'll have a Decision Vote instead. -- Larry Garfield [email protected] On Wed, May 11, 2022, at 1:58 AM, Ralf Lang wrote: > Hi Garfield, > > I would volunteer for log-util if you find that a useful option. I > would need some guidance initially as to what is within bounds of a > reasonable maint. policy and what requires wider discussion and > process. Otherwise, I think option 2 is quite sane. > > Ralf > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 7:08 PM Larry Garfield <[email protected]> wrote: >> Since PSR-3's type update, there has been an outstanding PR to create a >> log-util library to contain, mainly, the testing tools that were kicked out >> of the psr/log repo. >> >> https://github.com/php-fig/log-util/pull/6 >> >> The code is basically ready, but no maintainer has been appointed. And so >> it sits... >> >> If we want to get that released, there's 2 options. >> >> 1. Appoint a Maintainer for psr/log-util. Normally this would fall to >> Jordi by default as the PSR-3 editor, but I'm pretty confident that he has >> zero interest in it. If no one else is interested, I am willing to >> not-step-backwards. This would require a CC vote (either an Approval Vote >> or Decision Vote, depending on if it's contested.) >> >> 2. There's a fun loophole in the bylaws specifically for this; the CC is the >> de facto maintainer of everything, but delegates that to various people. >> Absent another maintainer, the CC collectively acts in that role. That >> means the CC (by which in practice I mean me, with the rest of the CC's >> blessing-by-silence) could go ahead and prep the library for its initial >> release(s). >> >> In either case, we'd then need a CC Approval Vote for the 1.0.0 release. >> >> Option 2 is a bit more squishy but also faster. Option 1 means at minimum 2 >> votes, which means at least a month before the library has a 1.0.0. Option >> 2 would mean minimum 2 weeks. (Both of those are "plus the time to actually >> do the logistics.") >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -- >> Larry Garfield >> [email protected] >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] >> <mailto:php-fig%[email protected]>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/7e7e16aa-1da9-4c95-8dde-7926b93ab4ae%40www.fastmail.com. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/CAB%2BY%2BErk%3DC_Q6g%2B6wMg_D2T7ydK7LuWGNtS5QCUPeq%2BcZxw0QA%40mail.gmail.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/CAB%2BY%2BErk%3DC_Q6g%2B6wMg_D2T7ydK7LuWGNtS5QCUPeq%2BcZxw0QA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/a8e1bfe9-192e-4543-99a1-7b7885987cd6%40www.fastmail.com.
