php-general Digest 20 Apr 2008 03:17:00 -0000 Issue 5414
Topics (messages 273300 through 273314):
Re: module access rights
273300 by: Ken Kixmoeller.com
273301 by: Ken Kixmoeller
Double billing problem
273302 by: tedd
273303 by: Dan Joseph
273304 by: Daniel Brown
newbie needs help with session variables
273305 by: Rod Clay
273307 by: revDAVE
273313 by: Warren Vail
Alter Table newbie help needed ...
273306 by: revDAVE
273308 by: Jason Norwood-Young
273310 by: revDAVE
Re: putting variables in a variable
273309 by: revDAVE
Re: PHP console script vs C/C++/C#
273311 by: Larry Garfield
273314 by: Nathan Nobbe
Re: OS X 10.5.2
273312 by: Lee Perry
Administrivia:
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Begin Message ---
On Apr 19, 2008, at 2:37 AM, Alain Roger wrote:
Hi,
i'm very surprised... i did not get any answer to my previous post.
is it because it is good way to do it or because nobody knows ?
-----------------------------------
Hi,
i face now a little issue regarding how end user can access to some
modules
of my web portal.
Let imagine we have several modules (let say: mod1, mod 2, mod3)
and 2 users
(usr1, usr2).
i would like to use a simple way how to established access rights
for each
user to grant/forbidden access to modules...
Or maybe the answer is as complicated as the question seems simple.
I have my master application object. On __construct, it checks the
current user's rights from somewhere (a config file or a database,
for example), and instantiates the application based on the rights
profile.
Simple answer, but a lot of front-end work to implement.
Ken
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Right. Thanks for the links. This type of approach is the basis of my
software architecture.
Ken
(BTW, don't forget to "Reply All" so your reply goes to the list, too).
On Apr 19, 2008, at 9:03 AM, Tony Marston wrote:
What you are describing is a Role Based Access Control (RBAC)
system, and it
is not simple. Take a look at
http://www.tonymarston.net/php-mysql/role-based-access-control.html
and
http://www.tonymarston.net/php-mysql/menuguide/index.html
Tony Marston
http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Kixmoeller.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 April 2008 14:33
To: PHP General List
Subject: Re: [PHP] module access rights
On Apr 19, 2008, at 2:37 AM, Alain Roger wrote:
Hi,
i'm very surprised... i did not get any answer to my
previous post. is
it because it is good way to do it or because nobody knows ?
-----------------------------------
Hi,
i face now a little issue regarding how end user can access to some
modules
of my web portal.
Let imagine we have several modules (let say: mod1, mod 2, mod3)
and 2 users
(usr1, usr2).
i would like to use a simple way how to established access rights
for each
user to grant/forbidden access to modules...
Or maybe the answer is as complicated as the question seems simple.
I have my master application object. On __construct, it checks the
current user's rights from somewhere (a config file or a database,
for example), and instantiates the application based on the rights
profile.
Simple answer, but a lot of front-end work to implement.
Ken
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi gang:
I have a problem. I set up a PayPal billing for a client. It's pretty
simple, the process sends the credit card information with payment
required to PayPal and then PayPal clears the transaction and sends
back a authorization. Everything works.
To stop the possibility of double billing, I did the following:
1. I check the database to see if the user has purchased the item
before. If so, then I don't allow them to purchase again.
2. I placed a javascript routine to disable the "Submit button for
purchase" after clicking once. That way, the user can only click it
once.
3. The "Submit button" when clicked once will send the data gathered
to another page ("Submit the data to PayPal) that actually submits
the data to PayPal. In that page I have a token that is assigned a
value upon loading. If the user refreshes the page, then the non-zero
token causes the page to destroy the sessions and redirect the user
to another page requiring the user to enter the data again.
4. Inside the above "Submit the data to PayPal" I have another token
that is assigned a value once the "send the data to PayPal" routine
is triggered. Once the token is non-zero, the routine won't send
anything to PayPal again.
However, even with all of this, occasionally a user will be charged
twice for the same purchase. Each charge is time-stamped and recorded
in our database -- the times between duplicate purchases vary from
from 3 to 23 seconds.
Now, my question is why? Is this a race issue or something similar?
And more importantly, what can I do about it?
Cheers,
tedd
PS: I have directed the question to PayPal as well.
--
-------
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 3:01 PM, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi gang:
>
> I have a problem. I set up a PayPal billing for a client. It's pretty
> simple, the process sends the credit card information with payment required
> to PayPal and then PayPal clears the transaction and sends back a
> authorization. Everything works.
>
> To stop the possibility of double billing, I did the following:
>
> 1. I check the database to see if the user has purchased the item before.
> If so, then I don't allow them to purchase again.
>
> 2. I placed a javascript routine to disable the "Submit button for
> purchase" after clicking once. That way, the user can only click it once.
>
> 3. The "Submit button" when clicked once will send the data gathered to
> another page ("Submit the data to PayPal) that actually submits the data to
> PayPal. In that page I have a token that is assigned a value upon loading.
> If the user refreshes the page, then the non-zero token causes the page to
> destroy the sessions and redirect the user to another page requiring the
> user to enter the data again.
>
> 4. Inside the above "Submit the data to PayPal" I have another token that
> is assigned a value once the "send the data to PayPal" routine is triggered.
> Once the token is non-zero, the routine won't send anything to PayPal again.
>
> However, even with all of this, occasionally a user will be charged twice
> for the same purchase. Each charge is time-stamped and recorded in our
> database -- the times between duplicate purchases vary from from 3 to 23
> seconds.
>
> Now, my question is why? Is this a race issue or something similar?
>
> And more importantly, what can I do about it?
>
> Cheers,
>
> tedd
>
> PS: I have directed the question to PayPal as well.
> --
> -------
> http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
Does paypal offer duplicate transaction protection? The merchant providers
I've worked with in the past has had it as part of their fraud protection
modules. For instance, you can set it how soon after that card can be
charged again. 1 min, 5 mins, etc. I found it a good final failsafe.
--
-Dan Joseph
"Build a man a fire, and he will be warm for the rest of the day.
Light a man on fire, and will be warm for the rest of his life."
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 3:01 PM, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi gang:
>
> I have a problem. I set up a PayPal billing for a client. It's pretty
> simple, the process sends the credit card information with payment required
> to PayPal and then PayPal clears the transaction and sends back a
> authorization. Everything works.
>
[snip!]
>
> PS: I have directed the question to PayPal as well.
When snipping the message like above, it sounds like you're
surprised it works and are suspicious.... much like when things work
out right with a Microsoft product.
As a resource, have you tried checking http://www.paypaldev.org/ ?
--
</Daniel P. Brown>
Dedicated Servers - Intel 2.4GHz w/2TB bandwidth/mo. starting at just
$59.99/mo. with no contract!
Dedicated servers, VPS, and hosting from $2.50/mo.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi. I'm still very new to php and still trying to learn the ropes.
I'm working on some code now trying to set up a session and use session
variables in different scripts, but I'm getting this message:
*Warning*: Unknown: Your script possibly relies on a session side-effect
which existed until PHP 4.2.3. Please be advised that the session
extension does not consider global variables as a source of data, unless
register_globals is enabled. You can disable this functionality and this
warning by setting session.bug_compat_42 or session.bug_compat_warn to
off, respectively. in *Unknown* on line *0
*2 questions:
1) I've turned on register_globals in all of my php.ini files and
restarted the webserver, but I'm still getting this message. Can anyone
help me with this?
2) I get the idea that one should NOT turn on register_globals, but, if
I don't do this, how do I share session variables between scripts (and
avoid this message)?
Thanks for any help that anyone can provide.
Rod Clay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 4/19/2008 2:20 PM, "Rod Clay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. I'm still very new to php and still trying to learn the ropes.
...Blind leading the blind (I'm a newbie also but...)
Did you try...?
session_id())
session_start();
- - - - -
From: PHP: session_id - Manual
Location: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/function.session-id.php
- - - - -
session_id() is used to get or set the session id for the current session.
The constant SID can also be used to retrieve the current name and session
id as a string suitable for adding to URLs. See also Session handling.
- - - - -
From: PHP: session_start - Manual
Location: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/function.session-start.php
- - - - -
Description
bool session_start ( void )
session_start() creates a session or resumes the current one based on the
current session id that's being passed via a request, such as GET, POST, or
a cookie.
If you want to use a named session, you must call session_name() before
calling session_start().
session_start() will register internal output handler for URL rewriting when
trans-sid is enabled. If a user uses ob_gzhandler or like with ob_start(),
the order of output handler is important for proper output. For example,
user must register ob_gzhandler before session start.
>
> I'm working on some code now trying to set up a session and use session
> variables in different scripts, but I'm getting this message:
>
> *Warning*: Unknown: Your script possibly relies on a session side-effect
> which existed until PHP 4.2.3. Please be advised that the session
> extension does not consider global variables as a source of data, unless
> register_globals is enabled. You can disable this functionality and this
> warning by setting session.bug_compat_42 or session.bug_compat_warn to
> off, respectively. in *Unknown* on line *0
>
> *2 questions:
>
> 1) I've turned on register_globals in all of my php.ini files and
> restarted the webserver, but I'm still getting this message. Can anyone
> help me with this?
>
> 2) I get the idea that one should NOT turn on register_globals, but, if
> I don't do this, how do I share session variables between scripts (and
> avoid this message)?
>
> Thanks for any help that anyone can provide.
>
> Rod Clay
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *
--
Thanks - RevDave
Cool @ hosting4days . com
[db-lists]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
As I understand it, the "register variables" operation occurred before
execution began on your script. It involved copying data items from your
form ($_POST), from the request URL ($_GET) and from your session
($_SESSION) so that you could simply refer to them by name in your programs.
The drawback was that someone could simply modify the URL to reference one
of your pages adding a variable to the request, and overlay variables in
your session, thereby modifying the execution of your programs, and driving
a truck thru any security you may have assumed was there.
The reason you want to keep register globals off becomes more obvious, and
when you look for variables in the $_POST array or the $_GET array or the
$_SESSION array, you can be reasonably sure it is coming from where you
expected it. This still doesn't protect you from "cross-site posting", but
certainly enhances your ability to control the source of data coming into
your programs.
HTH,
Warren Vail
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rod Clay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 2:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PHP] newbie needs help with session variables
>
> Hi. I'm still very new to php and still trying to learn the ropes.
>
> I'm working on some code now trying to set up a session and
> use session variables in different scripts, but I'm getting
> this message:
>
> *Warning*: Unknown: Your script possibly relies on a session
> side-effect which existed until PHP 4.2.3. Please be advised
> that the session extension does not consider global variables
> as a source of data, unless register_globals is enabled. You
> can disable this functionality and this warning by setting
> session.bug_compat_42 or session.bug_compat_warn to off,
> respectively. in *Unknown* on line *0
>
> *2 questions:
>
> 1) I've turned on register_globals in all of my php.ini files
> and restarted the webserver, but I'm still getting this
> message. Can anyone help me with this?
>
> 2) I get the idea that one should NOT turn on
> register_globals, but, if I don't do this, how do I share
> session variables between scripts (and avoid this message)?
>
> Thanks for any help that anyone can provide.
>
> Rod Clay
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *
>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Newbie - MAC - MAMP on port 8889
I have this connection to Mysql database called 'test'
Other Php stuff works ok but now I'm trying to alter the table (never did
that before...)
Connection called 'try1'...
<?php
# FileName="Connection_php_mysql.htm"
# Type="MYSQL"
# HTTP="true"
$hostname_try1 = "127.0.0.1:8889";
$database_try1 = "test";
$username_try1 = "test";
$password_try1 = "test";
$try1 = mysql_pconnect($hostname_try1, $username_try1, $password_try1) or
trigger_error(mysql_error(),E_USER_ERROR);
?>
The lines below don't error but also don't do anything....
I must be missing something here.... Right? Maybe it doesn't know to use
try1 connection? How do I add that?
<?php
$sql = 'ALTER TABLE `ztest` ADD `myfield2` VARCHAR(10) NOT NULL;';
---or---
$sql = 'ALTER TABLE `ztest` RENAME TO `ztest2`;';
?>
--
Thanks - RevDave
Cool @ hosting4days . com
[db-lists]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 14:23 -0700, revDAVE wrote:
> Newbie - MAC - MAMP on port 8889
>
> I have this connection to Mysql database called 'test'
>
>
> Other Php stuff works ok but now I'm trying to alter the table (never did
> that before...)
>
>
>
> Connection called 'try1'...
>
> <?php
> # FileName="Connection_php_mysql.htm"
> # Type="MYSQL"
> # HTTP="true"
> $hostname_try1 = "127.0.0.1:8889";
> $database_try1 = "test";
> $username_try1 = "test";
> $password_try1 = "test";
> $try1 = mysql_pconnect($hostname_try1, $username_try1, $password_try1) or
> trigger_error(mysql_error(),E_USER_ERROR);
> ?>
>
> The lines below don't error but also don't do anything....
>
> I must be missing something here.... Right? Maybe it doesn't know to use
> try1 connection? How do I add that?
>
> <?php
> $sql = 'ALTER TABLE `ztest` ADD `myfield2` VARCHAR(10) NOT NULL;';
> ---or---
> $sql = 'ALTER TABLE `ztest` RENAME TO `ztest2`;';
>
> ?>
Might be obvious but you are doing "mysql_query($sql);", right?
Also add a try catch around your mysql_query to check what's happening.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 4/19/2008 2:37 PM, "Jason Norwood-Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Might be obvious but you are doing "mysql_query($sql);", right?
Not so obvious to THIS newbie - now it works fine!!!!!
Thanks AGAIN!
>
> Also add a try catch around your mysql_query to check what's happening.
--
Thanks - RevDave
Cool @ hosting4days . com
[db-lists]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 3/28/2011 4:06 AM, "Hulf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am making and HTML email. I have 3 images to put in. Currently I have
>
> $body .="
> <table>
> <tr>
> <td><img src=\"image1.jpg\"></td>
> </tr>
>
> <tr>
> <td></td>
> </tr>
> </table>
> ";
>
>
> ideally I would like to have
>
> $myimage1 = "image1.jpg";
> $myimage2 = "image2.jpg";
> $myimage3 = "image3.jpg";
>
>
> and put them into the HTML body variable. I have tried escaping them in
> every way i can think of, dots and slashes and the rest. Any ideas?
I'm just a newbie - but
I did something like this (non - html mail) ... If it helps...
I created this var called $thebody - then stuck it in the mail tag... And it
works
--------------
$thebody = 'This is a some info...
UserID#: '. $_SESSION['nowuser'].'
Company: '.$_SESSION['now_co'].'
Worker Info: '. $edit_result_row->getField('First').' '.
$edit_result_row->getField('Last').'
Thanks,
';
---------------
--
Thanks - RevDave
Cool @ hosting4days . com
[db-lists]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Saturday 19 April 2008, Per Jessen wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > You are correct about asymptotic bounds on algorithms; however,
> > languages can still have a constant multiplier affect on an algorithm.
>
> Absolutely. When it comes to "how long does it take to process 1000
> elements", both language and hardware are critical factors. But the
> algorithm efficiency remains constant.
Certain languages are also well-suited to certain types of algorithms,
particularly when you're talking about languages with a runtime environment.
A recursion-heavy algorithm will perform far better in a functional language
than in a procedural language like PHP, because the runtime environment is
designed to make sub-routine calls, especially recursive ones, cheap. PHP's
sub-routine calls are relatively expensive compared to a functional language.
However, it's lookup capabilities on small to medium datasets are strong,
thanks to its solid array/hash implementation, so it is well suited to
algorithms that require array-able lookups.
The abstract algorithm assumes that each primitive operation is equal cost,
and then counts the operations. (An over-simplification, but that's the
general idea.) In practice, each operation does not have equal cost, and the
cost of different primitive operations varies widely between languages and
even versions of languages.
--
Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 6817012
"If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea,
which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to
himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession
of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it." -- Thomas
Jefferson
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Nick Stinemates
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think there was a single place where I said PHP was faster
> >> than C, nor did I imply it.
> >
> >> > Depends. Shitty algorithms are shitty, regardless of language
> >> > implementation.
> >
> > implies that the same algorithm in different languages will not
> > perform differently. thats innacurate.
>
> No, that is actually a very accurate statement.
umm, so whats going on here is the implicit component of the statement that
incorporates relative or absolute performance. in terms of relative
performance the statement is accurate; in terms of absolute performance, its
quite inaccurate.
> An algorithm will
> perform equally well regardless of the language chosen. How well the
> actual implementation performs overall is a separate issue. The
> performance or rather efficiency of an algorithm is usually expressed
> in the big-O notation, e.g. O(n), O(log(n)) etc.
>
> A linear search is O(n), a quick sort is O(nlog(n)) (on average) - both
> perform equally bad or equally well regardless of which language you
> choose to implement them in.
right, relative to the performance of said language.
> the same algorithm w/o external dependencies, such as db calls, or
> > calls to remote systems will run faster in java / c / c++ and others
> > than it will in php.
>
> An algorithm doesn't have external dependencies - but implementations
> might.
algorithms can have external dependencies. imagine a soap call in php.
imagine the call running on a windows / bsd / linux system. imagine the
call running on different networks. imagine the algorithm running on a
machine w/ lots of other apps running on it concurrently leaving resources
at a minimum and again it running on a powerful system dedicated to the
php-enabled web server. although the algorithm will run unaltered on all
these platforms the performance may, and likely will vary due to the
underlying network stack, OS, bandwidth of the Internet connection from and
to the service provider, etc.
so anyway; what you are talking about here is relative performance. the
same algorithm will have the same complexity (relative bounds) despite the
language its implemented in. however, in terms of absolute performance
languages will have different performances. the main reason php is slower
than c is because its interpreted, duh. thats why a O(n) algorithm in php
will run slower than the same O(n) algorithm in c. thats what the great
computer language shootout is all about. maybe you should take a look ;)
for example heres c vs. php;
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=gcc&lang2=php
its quite clear that c outperforms php on every algorithm. you can click
the links on each test to see the implementation of each algorithm in a
given language. and if you think you can improve the performance of a given
algorithm in a given language, then you can submit your code and see if it
actually runs faster. thats what the game part is :D and actually as a
complete side note c++ is actually topping c these days.
-nathan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
First let me say thank you for your help, I do appreciate you taking
the time to read my post.
I did come across the entropy.ch forum while searching on google but
(and I could be wrong here so sorry in advance) it seems that this
would lead to me having multiple versions of php and or apache. Also I
don't really want to be reliant on someone else for my stack. I would
prefer to get the bundled install working or learn how to build my own.
I have been trying to get the pdo_mysql driver from pear and have had
some success but still no banana !
I have installed pear and linked to the mysql_config file but I get
errors, I will post the output and hope one of you guys can see what
I'm missing. And thanks again in advance.
lee. ; )
Macintosh:pear lperry65$ sudo /usr/lib/php/pear/bin/pecl install
pdo_mysql
downloading PDO_MYSQL-1.0.2.tgz ...
Starting to download PDO_MYSQL-1.0.2.tgz (14,778 bytes)
.....done: 14,778 bytes
downloading PDO-1.0.3.tgz ...
Starting to download PDO-1.0.3.tgz (52,613 bytes)
...done: 52,613 bytes
12 source files, building
running: phpize
Configuring for:
PHP Api Version: 20041225
Zend Module Api No: 20060613
Zend Extension Api No: 220060519
building in /var/tmp/pear-build-root/PDO-1.0.3
running: /usr/lib/php/pear/temp/PDO/configure
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep
checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E
checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables...
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking whether gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... yes
checking for system library directory... lib
checking if compiler supports -R... no
checking if compiler supports -Wl,-rpath,... yes
checking build system type... i686-apple-darwin9.2.2
checking host system type... i686-apple-darwin9.2.2
checking target system type... i686-apple-darwin9.2.2
checking for PHP prefix... /usr
checking for PHP includes... -I/usr/include/php -I/usr/include/php/
main -I/usr/include/php/TSRM -I/usr/include/php/Zend -I/usr/include/
php/ext -I/usr/include/php/ext/date/lib
checking for PHP extension directory... /usr/lib/php/extensions/no-
debug-non-zts-20060613
checking for PHP installed headers prefix... /usr/include/php
checking for re2c... no
configure: WARNING: You will need re2c 0.12.0 or later if you want to
regenerate PHP parsers.
checking for gawk... no
checking for nawk... no
checking for awk... awk
checking if awk is broken... no
checking whether to enable PDO support... yes, shared
checking for ld used by gcc... /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-apple-
darwin9/4.0.1/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-apple-darwin9/4.0.1/ld)
is GNU ld... no
checking for /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-apple-darwin9/4.0.1/ld option to
reload object files... -r
checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -p
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking how to recognise dependent libraries... pass_all
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for ANSI C header files... rm: conftest.dSYM: is a directory
rm: conftest.dSYM: is a directory
yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking dlfcn.h usability... yes
checking dlfcn.h presence... yes
checking for dlfcn.h... yes
checking the maximum length of command line arguments... 196608
checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -p output from gcc object... rm:
conftest.dSYM: is a directory
rm: conftest.dSYM: is a directory
rm: conftest.dSYM: is a directory
rm: conftest.dSYM: is a directory
ok
checking for objdir... .libs
checking for ar... ar
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for strip... strip
rm: conftest.dSYM: is a directory
rm: conftest.dSYM: is a directory
checking if gcc static flag works... rm: conftest.dSYM: is a directory
yes
checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... rm:
conftest.dSYM: is a directory
no
checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fno-common
checking if gcc PIC flag -fno-common works... rm: conftest.dSYM: is a
directory
yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... rm: conftest.dSYM: is a
directory
yes
checking whether the gcc linker (/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-apple-
darwin9/4.0.1/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... darwin9.2.2 dyld
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... no
creating libtool
appending configuration tag "CXX" to libtool
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating config.h
running: make
Build complete.
Don't forget to run 'make test'.
running: make INSTALL_ROOT="/var/tmp/pear-build-root/install-
PDO-1.0.3" install
Installing shared extensions: /var/tmp/pear-build-root/install-
PDO-1.0.3/usr/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20060613/
cp: modules/*: No such file or directory
make: *** [install-modules] Error 1
ERROR: `make INSTALL_ROOT="/var/tmp/pear-build-root/install-PDO-1.0.3"
install' failed
7 source files, building
running: phpize
Configuring for:
PHP Api Version: 20041225
Zend Module Api No: 20060613
Zend Extension Api No: 220060519
autom4te: cannot open configure: Is a directory
ERROR: `phpize' failed
Macintosh:pear lperry65$
--- End Message ---
