php-general Digest 25 Aug 2009 07:55:41 -0000 Issue 6304 Topics (messages 297141 through 297167):
Re: unset( $anobject) does not invoce __destruct()
297141 by: Ralph Deffke
297142 by: Ralph Deffke
297147 by: hack988 hack988
297153 by: Lupus Michaelis
297158 by: Ralph Deffke
php move_uploaded_file() filesize problem
297143 by: Thomas Gabrielsen
297149 by: Ryan Cavicchioni
297150 by: Ryan Cavicchioni
297152 by: Thomas Gabrielsen
297154 by: Ralph Deffke
Re: What if this code is right ? It worked perfectly for years!!
297144 by: Paul M Foster
297145 by: Lars Torben Wilson
Re: preg_replace anything that isn't WORD
297146 by: hack988 hack988
297164 by: Shawn McKenzie
297165 by: Jonathan Tapicer
unset() something that doesn't exist
297148 by: Tom Worster
297156 by: Ralph Deffke
297162 by: Shawn McKenzie
297163 by: Shawn McKenzie
Re: PHP pages won't open correctly on my server.
297151 by: RRT
DOMNode children iteration (was Re: array() returns something weird)
297155 by: Szczepan HoÅyszewski
__destruct() not called ! we shot us in the foot try the script
297157 by: Ralph Deffke
297159 by: Jim Lucas
Re: Is there limitation for switch case: argument's value?
297160 by: Keith
Re: PHP Shopping Cart Recommendation
297161 by: sono-io.fannullone.us
security question of ZCE exam
297166 by: Augusto Flavio
anchor inside form
297167 by: leledumbo
Administrivia:
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
php-general-digest-subscr...@lists.php.net
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
php-general-digest-unsubscr...@lists.php.net
To post to the list, e-mail:
php-gene...@lists.php.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Begin Message ---I dont agree, and as u see in my snipped code it works fine. in an abstract class u can define an implementation to define some basic things a overwriting function in an extending class has to take care of as well. this includes specialy magic functions. thats what they are made for. may be you talk about interfaces ? "hack988 hack988" <hack...@dev.htwap.com> wrote in message news:4d03254c0908241122r5b6d1c3csc06ec475a0797...@mail.gmail.com... > see http://cn.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.abstract.php > PHP 5 introduces abstract classes and methods. It is not allowed to > create an instance of a class that has been defined as abstract. Any > class that contains at least one abstract method must also be > abstract. Methods defined as abstract simply declare the method's > signature they cannot define the implementation. > > You make misconception understand for abstract class,:(, correct code is: > abstract class a { > abstract public function __construct(){ > > } > abstract public function __destruct(){ > > } > } > > class b extends a{ > public function __construct(){ > echo "constructing....<br>"; > } > public function __destruct(){ > echo "destructing....<br>"; > } > } > > $c = new b(); > unset($c); > > if you want to make it work correctly that you want,plase change code to follow > class c { > public function __construct(){ > echo "constructing....<br/>"; > } > public function __destruct(){ > echo "destructing....<br/>"; > } > } > > class d extends c{ > > } > $e = new d(); > unset($e);
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Stuart, u are right, the refcount in php 5 doesn't matter, where something left behind in my memory from earlier days, However i do have the effect that unsetting an object does NOT call __dectruct() ! but when the script ends it is called. this can be easily tested by putting a echo in destruct. my objects affected are pretty much the sheme I send. however I'm doing some reflection stuff in my classes. may be thats the reason. I will do some further investigation about that. "Stuart" <stut...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:a5f019de0908240749l8fa749s825cfa0e475f7...@mail.gmail.com... 2009/8/24 Ralph Deffke <ralph_def...@yahoo.de>: > this is also not the full truth try this and it works > what are the circumstances that is causing this problem then, yes I do have > distributed references over my script and there are clearly references still > set, however after running the snipped script I can not see what I do > special in my script causing the problem. I even tried with public and > private static in other objects. it works. however the manual indicates the > refernce counter has to be 0. Assuming you're using PHP 5... > <?php > > > abstract class a { > public function __construct(){ > echo "constructing....<br>"; > } > public function __destruct(){ > echo "destructing....<br>"; > } > } > > class b extends a{ > > } > > $c = new b(); refcount = 1 > $d = $c ; // works refcount = 2 > $f[] = $c ; // works refcount = 3 > class e { > private $m; > > public function setM( $m ){ > $this->m = $m; > } > } > > $o = new e(); > $o->setM( $c ); // works refcount = 4 (due to assignment in setM) > unset( $c ); refcount = 3 In PHP 5 all objects are passed by reference unless explicitly cloned. This means that assigning an object variable to another variable does nothing more than assign a reference and increment the referece count. What exactly in the manual leads you to believe that after the unset the refcount should be 0? -Stuart -- http://stut.net/ > "Lupus Michaelis" <mickael+...@lupusmic.org> wrote in message > news:41.f9.03363.01192...@pb1.pair.com... >> kranthi wrote: >> > unset($obj) always calls the __destruct() function of the class. >> >> Never calls the dtor. The dtor will be called only when the reference >> count reaches 0. >> >> class c { function __destruct() { echo 'dying !' ; } } >> $v1 = new c ; >> $v2 = $v1 ; >> >> unset($v1) ; // don't call the dtor >> unset($v2) ; // call the dtor >> >> -- >> Mickaël Wolff aka Lupus Michaelis >> http://lupusmic.org > > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---i test your codes again,it is work correctly! But for backends compatibly with older php versions my codes is better :),i'm sorry for my mistake at moment.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Ashley Sheridan wrote:That would seem sensible to me though really. A constructor only bears true for the base class, so any classes which inherit it must incorporate all the constructor parts. A destructor doesn't know about further classes which will need to inherit it, so it shouldn't be inherited and the new class should sort things out. At least, that's how I see it.No, destructor can be set in abstract class. And it must if some advanced stuff done in the base classe. Like freeing ressources, closing file or database connections that is generic for classes that implements abstract stuff.So said, the __destuct destructor isn't called, for obvious reasons explained further.-- Mickaël Wolff aka Lupus Michaelis http://lupusmic.org
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---I did start a new topic have a look there; ""Ralph Deffke"" <ralph_def...@yahoo.de> wrote in message news:79.73.03363.43752...@pb1.pair.com... > but it should? shouldn't it how can I destroy a class instance invocing > __detruct() of the class ?!?!? > > > > >
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---HiI have a problem with uploading files that are bigger than the Master Value allow me to, which is 32 MB. I've set the max_upload_filesize and max_post_size in a .htaccess file and the phpinfo() reports the new local value (128 MB) according to the .htaccess, but the script fails silently with no errors every time I try to upload a file greater than 32 MB. Have any of you had the same problem?Thanks!Thomas Gabrielsen
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 09:54:03PM +0200, Thomas Gabrielsen wrote: > Hi > > I have a problem with uploading files that are bigger than the Master > Value allow me to, which is 32 MB. I've set the max_upload_filesize and > max_post_size in a .htaccess file and the phpinfo() reports the new local > value (128 MB) according to the .htaccess, but the script fails silently > with no errors every time I try to upload a file greater than 32 MB. Have > any of you had the same problem? Hello, What is 'memory_limit' set at Regards, --Ryan Cavicchioni
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 09:54:03PM +0200, Thomas Gabrielsen wrote: > Hi > > I have a problem with uploading files that are bigger than the Master > Value allow me to, which is 32 MB. I've set the max_upload_filesize and > max_post_size in a .htaccess file and the phpinfo() reports the new local > value (128 MB) according to the .htaccess, but the script fails silently > with no errors every time I try to upload a file greater than 32 MB. Have > any of you had the same problem? I stumbled across this blog post: http://www.gen-x-design.com/archives/uploading-large-files-with-php/ He suggests also looking at the script timeout and the 'max_input_time' ini setting. Regards, --Ryan Cavicchioni
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---"Ryan Cavicchioni" <ryan...@confabulator.net> wrote in message news:20090824205810.gc32...@mail.confabulator.net...On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 09:54:03PM +0200, Thomas Gabrielsen wrote:Hi I have a problem with uploading files that are bigger than the Master Value allow me to, which is 32 MB. I've set the max_upload_filesize and max_post_size in a .htaccess file and the phpinfo() reports the new local value (128 MB) according to the .htaccess, but the script fails silently with no errors every time I try to upload a file greater than 32 MB. Have any of you had the same problem?I stumbled across this blog post: http://www.gen-x-design.com/archives/uploading-large-files-with-php/ He suggests also looking at the script timeout and the 'max_input_time' ini setting. Regards, --Ryan CavicchioniHi Ryan, and thanks for your reply:I've allready set that, but I forgot to mention it in the first post. This is what my .htaccess looks like:php_value upload_max_filesize 64M php_value max_execution_time 800 php_value post_max_size 64M php_value max_input_time 100 php_value memory_limit 120MI'm very sure that it has something to do with the upload_max_filesize because I generated two files, one just a little greater than 32MB, and one just a little bit smaller. The latter file is uploaded fine, but the bigger one is not.Thanks!Thomas Gabrielsen
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---I would also be shure that u run into the srcipt time out time. of course there is one limit u can be a little bit under or a little bit above. measure the time with microtime() and compare it with the script time out settings and u will have the answer ralph_def...@yahoo.de ""Thomas Gabrielsen"" <tho...@arton.no> wrote in message news:df.aa.03363.30213...@pb1.pair.com... > > "Ryan Cavicchioni" <ryan...@confabulator.net> wrote in message > news:20090824205810.gc32...@mail.confabulator.net... > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 09:54:03PM +0200, Thomas Gabrielsen wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> I have a problem with uploading files that are bigger than the Master > >> Value allow me to, which is 32 MB. I've set the max_upload_filesize and > >> max_post_size in a .htaccess file and the phpinfo() reports the new local > >> value (128 MB) according to the .htaccess, but the script fails silently > >> with no errors every time I try to upload a file greater than 32 MB. Have > >> any of you had the same problem? > > > > I stumbled across this blog post: > > http://www.gen-x-design.com/archives/uploading-large-files-with-php/ > > > > He suggests also looking at the script timeout and the > > 'max_input_time' ini setting. > > > > Regards, > > --Ryan Cavicchioni > > Hi Ryan, and thanks for your reply: > > I've allready set that, but I forgot to mention it in the first post. This > is what my .htaccess looks like: > php_value upload_max_filesize 64M > php_value max_execution_time 800 > php_value post_max_size 64M > php_value max_input_time 100 > php_value memory_limit 120M > > I'm very sure that it has something to do with the upload_max_filesize > because I generated two files, one just a little greater than 32MB, and one > just a little bit smaller. The latter file is uploaded fine, but the bigger > one is not. > > Thanks! > Thomas Gabrielsen >
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:37:11AM -0700, Chris Carter wrote: > > Is there any alternative method to do this !!! Sending email through PHP? > Sure. You can use a class like PHPMailer rather than the built-in mail() function. But it's not going to matter if the problem is at the mail server, etc. Paul -- Paul M. Foster
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---2009/8/24 Paul M Foster <pa...@quillandmouse.com>: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:37:11AM -0700, Chris Carter wrote: > >> >> Is there any alternative method to do this !!! Sending email through PHP? >> > > Sure. You can use a class like PHPMailer rather than the built-in mail() > function. But it's not going to matter if the problem is at the mail > server, etc. > > Paul Agreed. Rather than just trying things willy-nilly, the OP should attempt to determine what the actual problem is. This gives a much greater chance of solving it. Torben
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Use preg_replace_callback instead! preg_replace_callback is better performance than preg_replace with /e. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- code $str="cats i saw a cat and a dog"; $str1=preg_replace_callback("/(dog|cat|.)/is","call_replace",$str); echo $str."<BR/>"; echo $str1; function call_replace($match){ if(in_array($match[0],array('cat','dog'))) return $match[0]; else return ""; } 2009/8/24 tedd <tedd.sperl...@gmail.com>: >> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 12:32 PM, “•ÈýÏÝ“•ÂÔ<danondan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Lets assume I have the string "cats i saw a cat and a dog" >>> i want to strip everything except "cat" and "dog" so the result will be >>> "catcatdog", >>> using preg_replace. >>> >>> >>> I've tried something like /[^(dog|cat)]+/ but no success >>> >> > What should I do? > > Lot's of ways to skin this cat/dog. > > What's wrong with exploding the string using spaces and then walking the > array looking for cat and dog while assembling the resultant string? > > Cheers, > > tedd > > > -- > ------- > http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---hack988 hack988 wrote: > Use preg_replace_callback instead! > preg_replace_callback is better performance than preg_replace with /e. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > code > > $str="cats i saw a cat and a dog"; > $str1=preg_replace_callback("/(dog|cat|.)/is","call_replace",$str); > echo $str."<BR/>"; > echo $str1; > function call_replace($match){ > if(in_array($match[0],array('cat','dog'))) > return $match[0]; > else > return ""; > } > > 2009/8/24 tedd <tedd.sperl...@gmail.com>: >>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 12:32 PM, “•ÈýÏÝ“•ÂÔ<danondan...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>>> Lets assume I have the string "cats i saw a cat and a dog" >>>> i want to strip everything except "cat" and "dog" so the result will be >>>> "catcatdog", >>>> using preg_replace. >>>> >>>> >>>> I've tried something like /[^(dog|cat)]+/ but no success >>>> >>> > What should I do? >> Lot's of ways to skin this cat/dog. >> >> What's wrong with exploding the string using spaces and then walking the >> array looking for cat and dog while assembling the resultant string? >> >> Cheers, >> >> tedd >> >> >> -- >> ------- >> http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com >> >> -- >> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > Certain posts of mine seem to get sucked into a black hole and I never see theme. Maybe because I use this list as a newsgroup? Anyway, what I posted before: Match everything but only replace the backreference for the words: $s = "cats i saw a cat and a dog"; $r = preg_replace('#.*?(cat|dog).*?#', '\1', $s); -- Thanks! -Shawn http://www.spidean.com
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---For the record Shawn: I received your previous post from Aug 22 and I think that it is the best solution. Jonathan On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Shawn McKenzie<nos...@mckenzies.net> wrote: > hack988 hack988 wrote: >> Use preg_replace_callback instead! >> preg_replace_callback is better performance than preg_replace with /e. >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> code >> >> $str="cats i saw a cat and a dog"; >> $str1=preg_replace_callback("/(dog|cat|.)/is","call_replace",$str); >> echo $str."<BR/>"; >> echo $str1; >> function call_replace($match){ >> if(in_array($match[0],array('cat','dog'))) >> return $match[0]; >> else >> return ""; >> } >> >> 2009/8/24 tedd <tedd.sperl...@gmail.com>: >>>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 12:32 PM, “•ÈýÏÝ“•ÂÔ<danondan...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>>> Lets assume I have the string "cats i saw a cat and a dog" >>>>> i want to strip everything except "cat" and "dog" so the result will be >>>>> "catcatdog", >>>>> using preg_replace. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I've tried something like /[^(dog|cat)]+/ but no success >>>>> >>>> > What should I do? >>> Lot's of ways to skin this cat/dog. >>> >>> What's wrong with exploding the string using spaces and then walking the >>> array looking for cat and dog while assembling the resultant string? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> tedd >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ------- >>> http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com >>> >>> -- >>> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) >>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >>> >>> >> > Certain posts of mine seem to get sucked into a black hole and I never > see theme. Maybe because I use this list as a newsgroup? Anyway, what > I posted before: > > Match everything but only replace the backreference for the words: > > > $s = "cats i saw a cat and a dog"; > $r = preg_replace('#.*?(cat|dog).*?#', '\1', $s); > > -- > Thanks! > -Shawn > http://www.spidean.com >
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---is it the case that unset() does not trigger an error or throw an exception if it's argument was never set?
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---causes an error Parse error: parse error, expecting `T_STRING' or `T_VARIABLE' or `'$'' in C:\wamp\www\TinyCreator\testCrapp6.php on line 42 "Tom Worster" <f...@thefsb.org> wrote in message news:c6b87877.11463%...@thefsb.org... > is it the case that unset() does not trigger an error or throw an exception > if it's argument was never set? > >
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Ralph Deffke wrote: > causes an error > Parse error: parse error, expecting `T_STRING' or `T_VARIABLE' or `'$'' in > C:\wamp\www\TinyCreator\testCrapp6.php on line 42 > > "Tom Worster" <f...@thefsb.org> wrote in message > news:c6b87877.11463%...@thefsb.org... >> is it the case that unset() does not trigger an error or throw an > exception >> if it's argument was never set? >> >> > > What!?!? No, It does not cause an error, not even a notice. -- Thanks! -Shawn http://www.spidean.com
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Ralph Deffke wrote: > causes an error > Parse error: parse error, expecting `T_STRING' or `T_VARIABLE' or `'$'' in > C:\wamp\www\TinyCreator\testCrapp6.php on line 42 > > "Tom Worster" <f...@thefsb.org> wrote in message > news:c6b87877.11463%...@thefsb.org... >> is it the case that unset() does not trigger an error or throw an > exception >> if it's argument was never set? >> >> > > What!?!? No, It does not cause an error, not even a notice. -- Thanks! -Shawn http://www.spidean.com
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---That link won't load for me. Did you get it to load OK for you? "Ryan Cavicchioni" <r...@confabulator.net> wrote in message news:20090824192749.ga13...@mail.confabulator.net... > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:30:00PM -0500, RRT wrote: >> PHP pages won't open at all on my server. HTML pages open fine, but when >> going to the PHP pages that are on my server, the browser tries to >> download >> the page like a file instead of presenting it by the browser. What can I >> do >> to make the PHP processor to be handled properly? Do I need to recompile >> it >> again, and if so, what switches should I use? >> >> I am running Apache version 2.2.11. I'm on Fedora 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 on >> that >> particular server. I'm running PHP 5.2.9 which I downloaded directly >> from >> the php web site, then untarred, ran make, and make install commands as >> described in the php INSTALL file that was included with the >> distribution.. > > Hello, > > If PHP is installed properly, look at step 14 (loading the module in > apache) and step 15 (Tell Apache to parse certain extensions as PHP) > in the PHP installation documentation. > > http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.unix.apache2.php > > Regards, > > -- Ryan Cavicchioni
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi Lars and list! New facts about the strange bug initially diagnosed as array() returning NULL: Firstly, the issue is not really about array() returning null, but about full blown UndefinedBehavior(TM) progressively trashing local variables. It just so happened that I noticed it first with a variable to which array() had been assigned just before things began breaking. Secondly, I proudly present the culprit: things break when I iterate over a DOMNode's children *by reference* using firstChild and nextSibling: for($child=&$node->firstChild; $child; $child=&$child->nextSibling) { //processing... } No problems if iteration is done by value or by DOMNodeList (childNodes, DOMXPath...). HOWEVER, I still consider this a bug because it destablizes PHP. After the evil loop has finished, things happen that should never happen, like a variable being NULL immediately after being assigned array(). I attach a demonstration. It is a self-contained commented script that you can execute from command line. Also attached is output on my machine. Best regards, Szczepan Hołyszewski<<attachment: testme.php>>
THE GOOD WAY (DOMNodeList): Recursion structure: ->render() ->render() ->render() <- ->render() <- <- <- Transformation result: Some text. [object type='foo' name='bar'][param name='__default_content'] Some parameter text. Some parameter text. [object type='bar' name='nested'][param name='__default_content'] Some nested parameter text. Some nested parameter text. [object type='baz' name='deeply_nested'][param name='__default_content'] [/param][param name='bold']true[/param][/object] More nested parameter text More nested parameter text [/param][/object] [/param][/object] Some more text Success! THE MIXED WAY (DOMNodeList at outermost level, then firstChild/nextSibling by ref): Recursion structure: ->render() ->render() ->render() <- ->render() <- <- <- Transformation result: Some text. [object type='foo' name='bar'][param name='__default_content'] Some parameter text. Some parameter text. __default_content[param name='__default_content']__default_content[/param][/object] [/param][/object] Some more text Is it really a success? THE EVIL WAY (firstChild/nextSibling by ref): Recursion structure: ->render() ->render() ->render() <- ->render() <-
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---well I would call this an error in the first view , and some of u where right! and the stuff with the refernce counter seems to be right as well. however I can't see a reason for it as 5.x works through refernces. so unsetting a REFERENCE to the object does not destroy it. How to destroy the object then? <?php abstract class a { public function __construct(){ echo "constructing....<br>"; } public function __destruct(){ echo "destructing....<br>"; } } class b extends a{ public function doSomething(){ echo "I'm doing ...but the reference c to the object is unset()<br>"; } } $c = new b(); $d = $c ; // works $f[] = $c ; // works class e { public static $m; public static function setM( $m ){ self::$m = $m; } } $o = new e(); e::setM( $c ); // works echo "unsetting ...<br>"; unset( $c ); $d->doSomething(); echo "script ending now ...<br>"; ?>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Ralph Deffke wrote: Sorry to bring it to this thread, but could you respond to Ashley in the "[PHP] wierd behavior on parsing css with no php included" thread. We would like the solution place in the archives to future visitor benefit. Thanks Jim
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Oh I see. I missed out one thing too.There is no need to put the same code under both case 7 & 6 separately, but just under case 6 will do.This is simpler in fact! Thanks Tedd and Torben! I'll fix to this style from now onwards."tedd" <tedd.sperl...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:p06240800c6b84328c...@[192.168.1.100]...At 9:44 PM -0700 8/22/09, Lars Torben Wilson wrote:Hi Keith, Glad it works! I'm not sure how inverting the case statement helps you minimize the code in each case. As both I and Adam showed, you can do the same thing more efficiently (and IMHO much more readably) like this: switch ($sum) { case 8: break; case 7: case 6: break; case 2: case 1: break; case 0: break; default: break; }Additionally, I would argue there's nothing different below other than it's even more easier to read and understand:switch ($sum) { case 0: break; case 1: case 2: break; case 6: case 7: break; case 8: break; default: break; } Cheers, tedd -- -------http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---The only e-commerce site I've worked on was based on OSCommerce. It'spretty good, easy to integrate new functionality into, and not too muchtrouble to style up to look the way you want with CSS.Thanks, Ash. I downloaded CRE Loaded, which is an off-shoot of osCommerce, and the latest version looks pretty nice. I'm digging in to the PHP code to see what that's like. I'm also looking at Magento. That may be more than what we need, but it's getting rave reviews.I can't wait to go 100% PHP on our site! Frank
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi all, i'm discutting with my friend about this question for 30 min and i do not agree with he. Here is the question: Why is it important from a security perspective to never display PHP error messages directly to the end user, yet always log them? Answers: (choose 2) Error messages will contain sensitive session information Error messages can contain cross site scripting attacks Security risks involved in logging are handled by PHP X Error messages give the perception of insecurity to the user X Error messages can contain data useful to a potential attacker My answers is marked with a X. some clue about this? thanks Augusto Morais
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---If I have an anchor inside form, how can I send form using the anchor without displaying target url? I've tried the code below but IE says that this.form is null or empty and Firefox does nothing. <form action="somewhere.php" method="get"> # Pick me </form> -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/anchor-inside-form-tp25129981p25129981.html Sent from the PHP - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--- End Message ---
