Clode? I like it. Really, who wants to say "closing php tag", "terminating php
tag", or whatever you say. Why not start calling it a clode? What does
everyone else think?
The only issue is if a "closing php tag" (or should it be a more general
"closing tag", with php being able to serve as a modifier when required, ie
"php clode") is a clode, would an "opening [php] tag" be an ode?
Comments?
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 12:47 pm, Christian Ista wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Look the code below. Is it an obligation to multiply the number of <?php
> ?>. There is no other way ? not possible to use only an open php tag
> (<?php) and a clode php tag (?>) ?
>
> Christian,
>
>
> <?php
> switch($constant_lastupdate[$i][3]){
> case '1' :?>
> <img src="design/logo_windows.gif" alt="" width="12" height="10"
> border="0">
> <?php
> break;
> case '2' :?>
> <img src="design/logo_mac.gif" alt="" width="10" height="10"
> border="0"> <?php
> break;
> case '3' :?>
> <img src="design/logo_linux.gif" alt="" width="9" height="11"
> border="0">
> <?php
> break;
> }
> ?>
--
"Two hands working can do more than a thousand clasped in prayer."
-Unknown
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
