?>HTML<? is almost double as fast according to some stats I saw a while ago
(at phpbeginner.com).. But that's compared to "HTML", using singlequotes is
faster ('HTML')... But I haven't confirmed those stats...
--
// DvDmanDT
MSN: dvdmandt€hotmail.com
Mail: dvdmandt€telia.com
##########################
Please, if you are using windows, you may be infected by Swen. Please go
here to find out more:
http://us.mcafee.com/virusInfo/default.asp?id=helpCenter&hcName=swen
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
##########################
"Joe Harman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i meddelandet
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello,
>
> I would like some opinions, or hopefully facts on a few things... Maybe
> some people can help me out here.
>
> A friend of mine and I were discussing which is best way to use PHP
> building dynamic pages, here are the 2 methods we are comparing.. They
> are in the simplest terms here... But try to imagine a very intesive PHP
> appliaction with huge MySQL queries...
>
>
> First Item
> -------------
> <table width="500" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
> <tr>
> <td><?php echo "Hello World"; ?></td>
> </tr>
> </table>
>
>
> Second Item
> -------------
> <?php
> echo "<table width=\"500\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\"
> cellpadding=\"0\">";
> echo "<tr>";
> echo "<td>Hello World</td>";
> echo "</tr>";
> echo "</table>";
> ?>
>
>
> Now I would say that the first item is the most efficient simply because
> you are not making PHP process the ECHO of HTML code... It's more
> efficient to let the browser do that since it has to interperat it
> anyhow. Am I correct assuming this?
>
> Thanks!
> Joe
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
