A well... what shall I say. I have to agree with you _A LOT_!!!
Netscape ruled, but doesn't anymore. It's a damn shame. They pretty
much stick to the standards (which I like very much) but the program
(browser) is f*cked up.

Anyway... My pages contain some tables about three within each
other. And NS can't handle tables to good. So if there is any
browser I'd want to use compression for... it'd be NS. That way the
data would be faster there and NS should have more time to process
it. So I'm not realy looking for I solution that only works for IE.
Because only compressing it for IE was something I'd thought about
already, but I don't realy think it's a reasonable option.

But... Thanks for spending your time to my problem!

RenzE


On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:51:09AM -0500, Michael Kimsal wrote:
> If you're using a templating system of some sort,
> if should be pretty easy to check the USER_AGENT and only
> compress if it's IE.  Or NOT compress is it's NS.
> 
> That's about the only way to do it easily that I can think of,
> and we're planning on implementing.
> 
> <rant mode="on">
> 
> I WANT to like netscape.  REALLY.  But they've pretty much made it
> impossible by not fixing things.  Historically, NS had an edge on features
> over IE, imo, till the 4 series.  Neck and neck, again, imo.  But
> without any significant changes in years its just way behind the times.
> 
> Reloading a page to do 'view source'?  (Sorry - POSTED data!)
> Reloading a page to print?
> Reloading a page after a browser resize?
> 
> Just ridiculous engineering, imo.  Even more so when you figure that,
> when this was first out, every one was on 14.4 modems.
> 
> <rant mode="off">
> 
> Hopt that helps.
> 

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to