On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:15:15 +0200 Daniel Kullik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Skippy wrote:
> Can you use this?

It seems to work, at first test, but it's somewhat convoluted. I've found
another fairly reasonable solution: using $val instead of %val%. This way I
don't need to ever show the actual contents of the random string in the
eval() and the problem becomes void.

I said "fairly reasonable" because it will still require a painful porting
period and letting people know they should move to $val, but in the long run
it will work. Here's a lesson about not testing well enough before deploying.

Thank you for the help just the same.

-- 
Skippy - Romanian Web Developers - http://ROWD.ORG

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to