ya, no doubt, i was going to repost my message, i should have said, that manual suggests using str_replace over ereg_replace... without reason.. i just assumed it was speed and resources..
eitherway, both would work, try em both. :) Jason John Nichel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jason Davidson wrote: > > i think str_replace is faster that ereg_replace > > > > Jason > > We tested that theory a while back on here (I don't remember the subject > of the emails, so finding it would be kind of hard), and it came out to > be almost exactally the same speed. > > -- > John C. Nichel > ÜberGeek > KegWorks.com > 716.856.9675 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
