Gerald Wharney wrote:
I'm trying the example at:
http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop.constructor.php
<?php
class A
{
function A()
{
echo "I am the constructor of A.<br />\n";
}
function B()
{
echo "I am a regular function named B in class
A.<br />\n";
echo "I am not a constructor in A.<br />\n";
}
}
class B extends A
{
function C()
{
echo "I am a regular function.<br />\n";
}
}
// This will call B() as a constructor.
$b = new B;
?>
Running this on 4.3.9 both as an apache module and
from CLI I get:
I am a regular function named B in class A.
I am not a constructor in A.
This is contrary to what the manual says:
"This is fixed in PHP 4 by modifying the rule to: 'A
constructor is a function of the same name as the
class it is being defined in.'. Thus in PHP 4, the
class B would have no constructor function of its own
and the constructor of the base class would have been
called, printing 'I am the constructor of A.<br />'."
Is this an error in the manual?
Or a bug in php 4.3.9?
Or just me being stupid?
as i understand it exactly as you, it must be a bug/error
--
Sebastian Mendel
www.sebastianmendel.de www.warzonez.de www.tekkno4u.de www.nofetish.com
www.sf.net/projects/phpdatetime www.sf.net/projects/phptimesheet
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
