Thanks, I just use my original SQL and setup a foreach loop to compare the 'ID' to see whether or not a record was returned with multiple row results.
I was just hoping someone had all ready figured out some kool, neato, voodoo-magic way to handle a one-to-many result like this. On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 13:02 -0800, Chris W. Parker wrote: > David Christensen <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Thursday, March 24, 2005 12:34 PM said: > > > I don't know how to say it any plainer than that. > > > > The original post would have produced the following: > > > > 1, 'joe', 'part1' > > 1, 'joe', 'part2' > > 1, 'joe', 'part3' > > > > but what I'd like to get is: > > 1, 'joe', 'part1, part2, part3' > > I think this is the explanation we needed. > > Serious question: Is it that you want someone to write the loop for your > do you just need some ideas? > > > Thanks for your help. I think I may have to redesign this thing to > > make this easier or I maybe I just don't have the vocabulary to ask > > the question correctly. > > A redesign sounds good. Maybe instead of trying to make an oddly > structured array you can instead adjust the code that receives the array > to receive the unmodified array? > > > Chris. > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
