On Mon, April 10, 2006 10:21 pm, Robert Cummings wrote: > On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 23:11, Richard Lynch wrote: >> On Mon, April 10, 2006 9:59 pm, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >> > Richard Lynch wrote: >> I've added a Note to 'fopen' so maybe others won't completely miss >> this feature and look as foolish as I do right now. :-) > > If it's anything like the helpful note I added about using copy( > source, > dest ) where dest accidentally points to source (due to linking), > you'll > get a nice retarded email like the following: > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > You are receiving this email because your note posted > to the online PHP manual has been removed by one of the editors.
I also have had what I still believe were actually quite useful comments deleted :-( And none of the reasoning in the stock form email applied, imho. It's an awfully long stretch or a very thin line between these: "Feature Request: Documentation" "User Contrbuted Note" I mean, the BEST "User Contributed Notes" probably qualify as Feature Requests to improve the Docs, no? Seems like those are the ones getting nuked, sometimes. Oh well. [shrug] Better than the alternative of having a lot of utter [bleep] in the User Contributed sections, I guess. Still, maybe an "appeal" or a reader-voting system would make more sense than a PHP Dev/Doc Team member copy-editing every note... Obviously you'd still want a Doc Team member stepping in at some point and just nuking anything blatantly "wrong" no matter how popular... -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
