At 1:44 AM -0400 6/16/06, Chris Shiflett wrote:
>Richard Lynch wrote:
>>It is possible that all "modern" browsers have given
>>in to whichever johnny-come-lately 'standard' made
>>up the Content-disposition header.
>
>The original RFC for it is dated June 1995, so it's not too recent. There are
>plenty of useful aspects of HTTP not defined in RFC 2616.
>
>>Content-type: application/octet-stream
>
>There's no reason you can't use both.
>
>Chris
Chris:
Barry says you can use these three:
header("Content-Type: application/force-download");
header("Content-Type: application/octet-stream");
header("Content-Type: application/download");
Richard says only use this one:
header("Content-type: application/octet-stream");
And, you say use both. Which both?
tedd
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
