Hi alex,
Alex Turner schrieb am 25.08.2006 10:36:
> My understanding is that the message said that the page had a mix of ssl
> and non ssl and that the root remained https. This root did not remain
> https before the key change.
maybe João will throw light on this ;)
we should wait for an answer.
greets
Mourad
--
>
> Mourad Boulahboub wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> Alex Turner schrieb am 25.08.2006 09:55:
>>> Mourad,
>>>
>>> I think that you might have misread the original post. The snag appears
>>> not to be the leaving of a secure site. The snag is that root document
>>> is secure but some of the embedded urls (images, frames, iframes etc)
>>> are unsecured. Whilst this again is a standard warning, it is one that
>>> should be avoided at all cost as it scares the stuff out of customers!
>>
>> this is the part the answer is depending on:
>>
>>> But, when the sale is finishes and my script run header("Location:
>>> http://www.?????";) to exit from the secure part, the browser gives me a
>>> notice
>> this is also the part, that João get confused by ;)
>> He says that everythign works fine until he leaves the secure site.
>>
>> Maybe the notice got shown before the change of the key to 256kb, and
>> get accepted to not show again in the future. Now after the change the
>> notice come again because it is a 256 key instead of 128kb. I don't know
>> if IE makes a difference in that
>>
>>
>>> AJ
>>> www.deployview.com
>> regards
>> Mourad
>
>
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
