On Thu, January 25, 2007 3:06 am, Sancar Saran wrote: > On Wednesday 24 January 2007 15:41, Roman Neuhauser wrote: >> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-01-24 13:57:03 +0200: >> > and also in these days I'm looking for 19 inch (or more) wide LCD >> > sceerns to able to fit longer lines in my screen... >> >> Number of reading errors people make grows with line length, >> this has been known for as long as I remember. You're increasing >> the >> probability of bugs in the code, and get tired sooner because >> following >> long lines requires more energy. > > Yes and no, because these days I'm obsessed very very large arrays > like > $arr['this']['is']['what']['i']['m']['looking']['for']; > > And If I start to do > > if( ($arr['this']['is']['what']['i']['m']['looking']['for'] > 5) && > ($arr['this']['is']['what']['i']['m']['looking']['for'] < 10)) > > blah blah > > then problem begins :)
Get back to us after you get over your array obsession... :-) I rarely find myself using more than 2-D, or occasionally, 3-D array lookups within any given section of code. I *might* have deeper arrays, but I'm either going to recurse through them, or break it down by what's actually in all those layers, and do something different as I descend. I would suggest that if one has data nested that deeply, perhaps the stat structure itself is a poor choice. :-) -- Some people have a "gift" link here. Know what I want? I want you to buy a CD from some starving artist. http://cdbaby.com/browse/from/lynch Yeah, I get a buck. So? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
