On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 22:41 +0800, Crayon Shin Chan wrote: > On Wednesday 20 June 2007 03:27, Robert Cummings wrote: > > > > 1) study a selection of frameworks and learn from their strengths and > > > weaknesses then go on to create a kickass framework based on what > > > you've learnt > > > > Now, now, let's not pretend that you even nearly suggested that in your > > original answer: > > > > "It's an extremely inefficient use of precious time. > > .... > > at it :)" > > > > You don't offer anything up. Only that pursing the creation of a > > framework is "extremely inefficient use of precious time" by relating > > it to Inventing of the wheel over and over. ... > > I still stand by that answer. But IF the OP wanted really really wanted to > create a new framework then that is where the first paragraph comes in. > > > > Please note the distinction between possibility and probability. > > > > Please stay on track. > > Note how hard it is to get a straight answer out of you. You said: > > > Ah but it is quite possible that the OP will go ahead and try to build > > a framework, he may fail miserably, all the while learning from his > > mistakes. Then he may try again and subsequently build a kickass > > framework. Since not all paths lead to the same conclusion it is just > > as possible that if he doesn't go down this path that he will never > > create a kickass framework no matter how many frameworks he studies. > > Which basically is saying, whatever path you choose the outcome may not > turn out the way you expect, which I summed up as: > > > Now you're trudging into the realms of philosophy, crystal ball gazing > > and groundless speculation. > > You counter with: > > > No, it's simple probability. > > Seeking clarification I ask: > > > So it's probability now? Which has the greater probability: > > > > 1) study a selection of frameworks and learn from their strengths and > > weaknesses then go on to create a kickass framework based on what > > you've learnt > > > > 2) just jump right in a create a kickass framework > > > > Please note the distinction between possibility and probability. > > And finally you dodge the question with: > > > Please stay on track.
Your question of "which has greater probability" was moving off track. It is irrelevant to the OP's question of how to start a framework and your original dismissive answer that all but said he shouldn't. > Similarly I ask at which point you made the word "update" to > mean "popularity": > > > > > > Read what I wrote above, I'm talking about UPDATES (or the lack > > > > > of), not popularity. > > > > > > > > You implied it. > > > > > > Where? How? Maybe the English that they taught me at school is subtly > > > different to the English that you learnt. > > > > I'm moving forward with the discussion, not backwards, Please keep up. > > I've no reason for the discussion to go into circular mode. > > And you dismiss the question out of hand - damn you're good at this. Because we already discussed popularity and how you implied it in a previous posting. I see now reason to circle back to that when the answer already exists in the mailing list archives. > <sarcasm> > > > Still, it's good to know that your code is flawless and can be relied > > > upon. > </sarcasm> > > > So obviously I said they were all fallacious. Perhaps you don't > > understand what fallacious means. > > Perhaps you don't recognise sarcasm when you see it? No, I'm unable to read your mind and in the absence of facial and vocal cues I can only ascertain sarcasm by the above NEWLY included sarcasm delimiters or by a winkie smiley (or other similar smileys) that usually accompanies such contexts as sarcasm. Cheers, Rob. -- .------------------------------------------------------------. | InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com | :------------------------------------------------------------: | An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting | | a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services | | such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn | | also provides an extremely flexible architecture for | | creating re-usable components quickly and easily. | `------------------------------------------------------------' -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
