On 6/29/07, Ryan A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just did a quick benchmark for 10.000 hands (making a full deck on
your code, 23.5 players):
Microtime difference:
Ryan's code:15.725826978683
Tijnema's code:0.40006709098816
Unique decks out of 10000:
Ryan's code:10000
Tijnema's code:10000
When making a full deck my code is 40 times faster, and a lot less
memory intensive. And as you can see, for both all 10000 decks are
unique, so both are random :)
But, also when generating cards for only 4 players, my code is twice
as fast as yours, and both generate still 10000 random decks:
Microtime difference:
Ryan's code:0.82403707504272
Tijnema's code:0.40426802635193
Unique decks out of 10000:
Ryan's code:10000
Tijnema's code:10000
>>>>>>>>>>>
Hey Tijnema,
I really had no doubt about your code being faster and cleaner... (as i
mentioned in my original post) but can you send me the benchmarking scripts
that you used so i may test them a bit more?
Thanks!
Ryan
Sure, you can look at the code here:
http://86.86.80.41/cards.phps
Tijnema
------
- The faulty interface lies between the chair and the keyboard.
- Creativity is great, but plagiarism is faster!
- Smile, everyone loves a moron. :-)
________________________________
Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and
always stay connected to friends.
--
Vote for PHP Color Coding in Gmail! -> http://gpcc.tijnema.info
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
