That wouldn't work well when you have to update multiple tables in a
transaction.
I think it's more maintainable to use GLOBALS than passing around dbh
to classes/functions.
On Dec 19, 2007 11:07 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> please reply to the list ...
>
> js schreef:
> > I always store database handler in $GLOBALS.
> > I think that's the best place to save request-level-global.
> > I wonder where other people save that kind of data.
>
> how about a static variable inside a function or a static member of a class.
>
> e.g.
>
> function getDB($args) {
> static $conn = array();
>
> $key = serialize($args);
> if (!isset($conn[ $key ])
> $conn[ $key ] = new DBConn($args);
>
> return $conn[ $key ];
>
> }
>
> >
> > On Dec 19, 2007 9:52 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Sancar Saran schreef:
> >>> Hello list.
> >>>
> >>> I want know to you opinions about using $GLOBALS directly.
> >>>
> >>> like
> >>>
> >>> $GLOBALS['myString'] = 'test';
> >>> $GLOBALS['myArray']['this'] = 'this';
> >>> $GLOBALS['myArray']['that'] = 'that';
> >>> $GLOBALS['myClassObj] = new SomeClass;
> >> there is no real difference between 'global $foo' and $GLOBALS['foo'],
> >> and the second is probably more maintainance friendly (as Rob pionted out)
> >>
> >> that said, avoid globals like the plague - sometimes you may come up with
> >> a situation where using a global is really necessary - such situations
> >> should
> >> be the exception rather than the rule, often if your thinking of using a
> >> global there is another way of doing it. jmho
> >>
> >>
> >>> Regards
> >>>
> >>> Sancar
> >>>
> >> --
> >> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >>
> >>
>
>
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
