On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 13:41 -0600, Greg Donald wrote:
> On 2/27/08, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ya; rob; greg is like the new dude on the witty block;
> > better pack something good for a comeback :O
> > my heads still smoking while i try to think up something
> >  moderately so ~:(
> 
> I'm not gonna just sit here and watch someone "*lol*" comparing the
> bloated nature of ASP to PHP when I can make the _exact same
> comparison_ using Ruby (and/or Rails) compared to PHP.  Rob then
> follows with the very predictable reply that I am somehow wrong in
> comparing PHP to a "framework" rather than to a language, but then
> isn't ASP, the object of Rob's "*lol*", also a framework of sorts?
> Pot-kettle-black.

I thought ASP was the language and .NET was the framework. Maybe I'm
wrong, but I pointed out that glaring issue when I mentioned GD and
ImageMagick versus the .NET image lib. And the target of my *lol* was
the whole question of comparison... the outdated document, the obvious
ugliness of ASP code, the FUD, etc, etc.

So is ASP really a framework? Did I get that wrong... I'm not always
right you know, especially about MS crap.

Thanks for letting me know I'm predictable BTW, I wouldn't want to
surprise.

Cheers,
Rob.
-- 
.------------------------------------------------------------.
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
:------------------------------------------------------------:
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting  |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services  |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for       |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily.          |
`------------------------------------------------------------'

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to