Colin Guthrie wrote: > The other thing about git particularly for web projects that store > multiple revisions of binary data (images etc.) is that the git-clone > could end up taking up much more space than the SVN equiv. Due to the > fact that a git clone is essentially a full copy of the whole > repository, rather than just a "checkout" (SVN checkouts store twice as > much as the raw data but that's a constant).
Just to clarify my last point, you *can* compact down a git repo and reproduce deltas etc. but this doesn't change the fundamental architectural difference (which to clarify I'm not saying is wrong, just different to SVN :)). Col -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
