On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Robert Cummings <rob...@interjinn.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 13:30 -0500, haliphax wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:53 AM, bruce <bedoug...@earthlink.net> wrote: >> > and haliphax... >> > >> > i specifically sent the reply to only you.. you then felt the need to reply >> > to the list as a whole.... >> > >> > hmm.. ok.. this thread is officially dead!! >> > >> > unless of course it gets back to the initial question... >> > >> > peace!! >> > >> > >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> >> > From: haliphax [mailto:halip...@gmail.com] >> >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:38 AM >> >> > To: email@example.com >> >> > Subject: Re: [PHP] Workflow app for software >> >> --8<-- >> >> >> Again, please do not top-post. It is the agreed-upon procedure in this >> >> list to bottom-post when replying to threads. (I am not just going >> >> "renegade thread-Nazi" on you.) >> > >> > Could you show me the signed agreement list. While it's convention on >> > this list, it's certainly not something everyone agreed upon. >> >> To Rob, >> I meant agreed-upon as in: it's been written... so somebody had to >> agree to it up to the point that it was posted here - >> http://us3.php.net/reST/php-src/README.MAILINGLIST_RULES > > "It has been written" and "it has been agreed upon" are two completely > different things. Many things have been written, few things are agreed > upon.
Unless the PHP development process has become a dictatorship, I'm pretty sure more than one person decided it was a good idea before putting it in the mailing list rules. -- // Todd -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php