Hi Colin and Daniel, Thanks for the feedback.
I know that this functionality can be added to a framework or a stand alone function but I'm assuming that we would not get the same performance: Case 1 ----------- $c = isset($a) ? $a : ''; // total time = overhead of isset() + overhead of ?: Case 2 ----------- $c = myWrapper($a,$b) // total time = overhead of myWrapper() + overhead of isset() + overhead of ?: Case 3 ----------- $c = ifset($a,$b) // total time = overhead of ifset() Best regards __ Raymond Irving --- On Thu, 4/30/09, Daniel Brown <danbr...@php.net> wrote: > From: Daniel Brown <danbr...@php.net> > Subject: Re: [PHP] Two very useful PHP functions > To: "Raymond Irving" <xwis...@yahoo.com> > Cc: php-general@lists.php.net > Date: Thursday, April 30, 2009, 11:37 AM > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 22:32, > Raymond Irving <xwis...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > > What do you think? Can they make it into 5.3? > > Not when doing the ternary operator that you > even displayed > yourself takes up less code and time than a core function > would. It's > a good idea, but better handled on the frontend of > things. You may > want to consider contributing that to a framework, which is > where it > would be more appropriate. > > -- > </Daniel P. Brown> > daniel.br...@parasane.net > || danbr...@php.net > http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/ > 50% Off All Shared Hosting Plans at PilotPig: Use Coupon > DOW10000 > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
