On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Tommy Pham <tommy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've never tested the difference for performance.  If that's the case,
> any particular reason to stop support ISAPI for IIS then? or is
> FastCGI faster than ISAPI for IIS?

It is faster, however the ISAPI was not maintained and has issues. But
what is the relation with Apache?

> I've meant official in the sense that one could download from the
> official/mirror site.  Thus it's more trust worthy, in terms of non
> malicious code.

The developers at apachelounge.com work with th Apache project. We
would not recommend to use it if we do not trust this project.


@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to