On Nov 19, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Stuart Dallas <stu...@3ft9.com> wrote: > On 19 Nov 2012, at 19:35, Tim Streater <t...@clothears.org.uk> wrote: > >> On 18 Nov 2012 at 14:44, Jim Giner <jim.gi...@albanyhandball.com> wrote: >> Just so. Perhaps those who are not grasping the point could re-read their >> copy of "The Elements of Programming Style" by Kernighan and Plauger where >> this sort of issue is covered. > > And of course, nothing is allowed to have changed since 1978! Using a switch > in that manner is normal for me. Should I change my style simply because you > don't agree with it? If so, why don't you change your style because I don't > agree with that? Code is art; there is no "right" way to do it. Can code be > shown to be more efficient, elegant, faster, cleaner? Yes. Right or wrong? No.
+1 for me as well. Publish data -- January 11, 1976??? This may be your father's book (or grand-father in my case). So, don't confuse me with old facts -- buy new ones. Just look to other languages (such as JAVA) for variations in switch. I think php got it right. After all, while(), if(), do/while() and even for() work around the concept of true -- why not switch? Cheers, tedd PS: We've had this conversation many years ago (but not as far back as 1976). _____________________ t...@sperling.com http://sperling.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
