On 2 Apr 2013, at 14:50, Sorin Badea <sorin.bade...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't want to wait for it and surely I don't want to safe that pid in
> same place. I just want to use `ps` with a pattern to return my forked
Storing the PID of a process you need to monitor is the established method, and
is certainly the most reliable. Why can't you use the PID as the pattern to
look for? If there's a reason then please explain it as that will help us
assist you. If there's no reason then I don't understand why you're trying to
If you're just wanting to monitor it from the process that forked it then you
don't need to store the PID anywhere other than a variable, and you don't need
to wait for it.
If you absolutely must do this then the only way is via an extension such as
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Matijn Woudt <tijn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> pcntl_fork will return the pid of the fork, what is wrong with using that
>> pid to identify the process?
>> - Matijn
>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Sorin Badea <sorin.bade...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>> I'm trying to find a solution to identify a php process that is spawned
>>> with pnctl_fork. I've tried to set a custom gid but this isn't viable
>>> because I have to run the parent proc with administrative permissions. I
>>> need to do this native without any pecl extensions.
>>> Is there a way to do this ?
>>> Badea Sorin (unu.sorin)
> Badea Sorin (unu.sorin)
> Pagina personala: