On Apr 24, 2013 9:46 PM, "tamouse mailing lists" <tamouse.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Andrew Ballard <aball...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Adam Richardson <simples...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Andrew Ballard <aball...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> The other developer in our office spent some time profiling the site with > >>> xdebug and found that an exec() call to netsh used on a couple pages seems > >>> to take 2-4 seconds to complete. Unfortunately, those exec() calls are the > >>> one function that we cannot test in our development environment. > > I'm wondering if it would be possible to carve out the part doing the > netsh calls so they're not part of your web application's stack, and > make them an asynchronous part?
Possibly, but it needs to be as close as possible to real time. We've been looking into caching the results for a short time (15sec?) so concurrent requests can share results. The problem right now is that we can't seem to duplicate the issue we were having, so it's impossible to know for sure whether any solution we try actually solves the problem. Andrew
