You are completely right.  Do intensive error checking.  In thousands and 
thousands of lines of code, I think i only used @ in 3 places -  in the 
functions that connect to the database - I have more robust error checking 
in place.

-Jason Garber
deltacron.com

At 09:26 AM 9/27/2001 +0200, * R&zE: wrote:
><Original message>
>From: Jason G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 03:25:16AM -0400
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [PHP] handling errors
>
> > Placing an @ symbol before the function name will suppress any errors.
> > @GetImageSize()
>
></Original message>
>
><Reply>
>
>Yep, I know it does. Yet, it's still no good way of handling your
>errors/warnings. Unless you made some real intensive errorchecking
>yourself, you should not use that @-construction or lower the
>errorreportinglevel. Reporting should be as high as possible
>(E_ALL). And yes, indeed, it might then just be that you get a lot
>of warnings (and/or errors). Then you have to fix your code, not
>start using @ in order to supress them. Errors and warnings are not
>reported without a reason you know. Even if your code works, when
>there are warnings it can still happen that in some situation the
>code will crash.
>
></Reply>
>
>--
>
>* R&zE:
>
>
>-- 
>-- Renze Munnik
>-- DataLink BV
>--
>-- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-- W: +31 23 5326162
>-- F: +31 23 5322144
>-- M: +31 6 21811143
>--
>-- Stationsplein 82
>-- 2011 LM  HAARLEM
>-- Netherlands
>--
>-- http://www.datalink.nl
>-- 
>
>--
>PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to