Jason, et al -- ...and then Jason Wong said... % % On Friday 03 January 2003 11:50, Michael J. Pawlowsky wrote: % > I was wondering if anyone had a good BreadCrumb class. ... % % You have started a new thread by taking an existing posting and replying to % it while you changed the subject.
I try not to harp on this, though I vehemently agree that it just shouldn't be done. The probblem is that those who typically do this (usually it's LookOut! users; this is the first time I've noticed Calypso as the X-Mailer: and I'm sure there are some others) can't even see the threading information and can't use it in their MUA, "threading" only by a Subject: line, and will probably never learn. Since I use mutt and have the thread-breaking and thread-joining patch installed, I just break the thread and move on. Absolutely classic, though, was Jim MacCormaic's identical attempt at a new thread in response to your message! HAND :-D -- David T-G * There is too much animal courage in (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * society and not sufficient moral courage. (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mary Baker Eddy, "Science and Health" http://justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg91459/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
