I don't like using images in emails too, but what the customer wants they get.
Mark. "Johannes Schlueter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On Thursday 06 February 2003 19:12, Mark McCulligh wrote: > > I have a little app that sends email, All images I link back to the site > > Example: <img src="http://www.site.com/images/pic1.gif";> > > > > I know that with the normal mail() and pear mail function you can attach > > the image with the email. > > My question is what is better. Linking the image back to the site is very > > easy, but is there any disadvantage to this option, that attaching the > > image to the email would fix. > > > > In short I am looking for the pros and cons to both methods. > > What comesfirst to my mind is: > > pro linking to Website: > - small mail > con > - user needs to be online to see it > - this kind of linking could be disabled (you could create a link > www.site.com?image?mail=32&user=USERID and you know > when and wether the user read the mail...) and some users > could dislike this > > Best: Don't use images in a mail ;-) (just my opinion...) > > johannes -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
![http://www.site.com/images/pic1.gif"](http://www.site.com/images/pic1.gif"){kind=link}