I am not on the php-icu list, but from my understanding of the state of the project and the players that are working on it, there isn't much to discuss. It is pretty well baked. (Or so I hope. I thought this would ship last Nov. I can't believe it is May already.)
tex > -----Original Message----- > From: Pierre Joye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 11:57 PM > To: Texin, Tex > Cc: Andi Gutmans; Ed Batutis; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; php-i18n@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-I18N] RE: [PECL-CVS] cvs: pecl /intl > php_intl.c /intl/doc grapheme_api.php /intl/grapheme > grapheme.h grapheme_string.c /intl/tests grapheme.phpt > > Hi! > > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Texin, Tex > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For some reason when I changed my subscriptions a few > weeks ago, they didn't take. > > I resubscribed to internals and i18n yesterday and it > seems to be working now. > > > > As I recall we discussed the naming and Stas did reply to > the list with the rationale. > > There may not have been agreement with the rationale, but > it was stated. > > I can't find a discussion about that. > > > If you think the naming is ok, I wonder why it is still > being discussed.... > > > > I have changed companies and e-mails so I am a bit out of > the loop. Can someone tell me where we are at? > > For what I understand and see, there is (still) the php-icu > list which is not public, not under lists.php.net, has no > pbulic way to subscribe. That's what Bjori, other (me > included) has been argued about since weeks now. The php-i18n > list was dead until recently but > the big issue here is the discussions about intl happening outside > the public space. > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > -- PHP Unicode & I18N Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
