Hi!
What are the good reasons for not changing the names?
This was already discussed on the list, so reading the archives would
help. But OK, here it goes again:
1. We want the extension to be in 5.2 to 6.x
2. We want PHP source code compatibility between 5.x and 6.x code
3. We want PHP 6 users use class Collator when they need collator, not
some weird long name, same with Locale etc.
4. intl extension, unlike many others, do not have one functional
module, but multiple ones, related only by underlying library. Thus
prefixing all modules with extension name makes as much sense as
prefixing all functions using libc or libm with common prefix. Each
functional module, of course, does have its own prefix.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
(408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Unicode & I18N Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
