We run that exact setup on one of the boxes, zero problems.
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 15:37, Gedanken wrote: > I asked my isp to upgrade their 4.1.2 php to 4.3.2 because I am working on > a code porting project that I am told 'needs' 4.3.2. It definitely doesnt > seem to work so far with out it... socket code problems. > > anyway, i sent a note to my admin and he replied with the following > (edited by me): > > --- > > We also have Apache 1.3.27 on RedHat 7.3 running on those same webservers > and I don't believe that PHP 4.3.2 will run on those versions. We > recently attempted to build a webserver running RedHat 8.0, Apache 2.0, > and PHP 4.2.1. The build failed because the versions of Apache and PHP > were unstable together. > > We plan on consolidating our webservers into one large, powerful server, > one which hopefully will be running the latest and greatest versions of > apache and php. If you konw of any successful builds of Redhat, apache > and php or if there is a build of php 4.3.2 that will work with Apache > 1.3, then I'll be more than happy to upgrade. > > --- > > what can i tell him? How is the current 4.3.2 php with apache 1.3.27 and > redhat 7.3? > > also, to get into more detail, im not even sure why i need apache. its > not a web based application... its just a little script that opens sockets > and polls either other socket apps or other webservers to download pages > for me. its run as a daemon, not executed as a cgi. in perl lingo (my > background), its a script not a cgi. can i try installing some CLI only > version of php and just skip this webserver issue? seems crazy i am > forced to have a webserver installed to install a scripting interpreter > that will never use it. > > > > -- > gedanken -- Adam Voigt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Linux/Unix Network Administrator The Cryptocomm Group -- PHP Install Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
