I also think having the rule class::method syntax on the left here is quite redundant because it's repeated 3 times on the page. already as the page title, and in the 'description' field, reference the screenshot i posted above.
should we give it a shot ? (welcome GoogleGuy) On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Levi Morrison <[email protected]>wrote: > Including Sherif (aka GoogleGuy). He's been a fairly active > participant so he should be included in the loop. > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Paul Dragoonis <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'm in favour of this. See this screenshot [1] we already know we're > inside > > the class since it's large text, has a purple left side and the methods > are > > indented within it too. > > > > [1] http://puu.sh/1Lery > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Levi Morrison <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> The sidebar is larger now to help compensate for this but doesn't > >> solve the problem. There was an idea to remove the class-name from the > >> methods altogether. I personally like the idea but what do you guys > >> think? > > > > >
