On 02/25/2013 11:35 AM, Thomas Anderson wrote:
I have two RFCs that I'd like to propose. They are attached if anyone
wants to review them here.




Hi,

We do appreciate you putting forward suggestions.

Those RFCs seem very brief, even for draft ideas.  You should probably
bring the ideas up on the PHP 'internals' mail list - and be prepared
to robustly defend your position.  After getting a feeling for how the
ideas would be received, then you can go ahead with formal RFCs.

There is no PHP 6, so think very, very carefully before submitting
this particular idea. I'd recommend you review previous discussions,
and also look at the code base to see what changes are feasible before
bringing up the idea. When you do submit the idea, don't reference PHP
6. Instead, state what changes from PHP 5 you want to see.

To get wiki access, see https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto

Note we put in a new RFC template in the last few days. It is designed
to help RFC authors think about the whole impact of a proposed
feature.  You can see the template at
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/template. Note the section about
patches.  It is useful to state who would be doing any coding,
so the project feasibility and effort required can be evaluated.  If
you aren't going to do the coding, your RFC is unlikely to succeed.

Also review
https://blogs.oracle.com/opal/entry/the_mysterious_php_rfc_process

Thanks,

Chris

--
[email protected]  http://twitter.com/ghrd
Newly updated, free PHP & Oracle book:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/php/underground-php-oracle-manual-098250.html

--
PHP Webmaster List Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to