On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Hannes Magnusson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Daniel Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Hannes Magnusson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> To be honest, I like it better unstyled then how it was :) >>> There is also so much weird inline styling that has to be killed >>> before we can make it better again. >> >> You might, but I don't. And I'm the one who uses it most. ;-P >> >>> Where did status.php.net come from and how does that work? How is it >>> different from master ? >> >> I built it last year or the year before. Mirror maintainers use >> it to see how their mirrors look from our end. > > > How does it work? > > Is it a partial checkout from master? > I'm asking cause I don't see a reason why that doesn't work, but > viewing the same thing on master works just fine.
It was using the same sources, but pointed to the network subdirectory so the new /shared/ folder wasn't being served. Loading the stylesheets returned 200 OK, but was actually hitting api.php which had die() in it without changing the status code. I added an apache Alias and new Directory config for the /shared/ path and it seems to work. I would however rather like to move this into its own repo, it is weird that it is serving a subdirectory from master - which is also accessible from master? You ok with me migrating it over to web-status repo? Or maybe call it web-network-status ? -Hannes -- PHP Webmaster List Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
