On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Maciej Sobaczewski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I wasn't even aware anyone was still using doc.php.net for anything. > > I was contributing for a Polish manual version few months ago and on of our > team members told me about that site. I think there are many advanced tools > (mainly revcheck.php and it's submodules) and documentation mantainers are > using them. > > However there is no doubt that it's key aspect. If almost noone is using > this service, there's no sense to improove it, especially if we are talking > about something such big as I wrote. > > I think that there are people versed in a topic. Maybe someone can tell what > is the real status of doc.php.net - isn't such big update a waste of time? >
I think there are two things used there: - recvcheck - phd release page The various doc tools, like the url entity checker even, is being ignored. PEAR, PECL and PHP-GTK never used this site. The dochowto may/may not be in usable shape. I am actually confused if the version on wiki or doc is up2date and the recommended one? Most of the tools I think are already integrated into edit.php.net. My only regret, if we retire doc.php.net, is that PhD was not allowed to have its own subdomain, so it will go down with it. Moving PhD to its own subdomain at this time makes no sense. I think you can work on that site as much as you want, trying to spark some new life into it, or retire it (moving doesn't-exists-elsewhere somewhere else). -Hannes -- PHP Webmaster List Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
