On May 28, 2014, at 12:56 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Joe made a post about the introduction on phpng, what it is, and what it
> isn't.
> Some people (myself included) didn't liked that post for various reasons
> (some says it is opiniated, some doesn't like the tone and the wording,
> others feel that it is too early to made official announcement about phpng).
> There were a couple of iteration on improving the text, but it is still not
> up to our standards imo:
> http://git.php.net/?p=web/php.git;a=history;f=archive/entries/2014-05-27-1.xml
> ;
> It is already on hackernews and reddit, so while some people suggested, I
> think it would be a bad move to just remove it.
> 
> Would like to know what do you guys think about the best step, I see the
> following possible options:
> 
>   - keep it as is
>   - remove it
>   - rewrite it to be more formal and factual(only talk about what it is
>   atm. not what it could be in the future).
>   - create a post explaining that this post is controversional among the
>   core-devs, so it is reflects more of the authors opinion than the projects
>   official view on the topic.
> 
> I'm mostly interested on the opinion of the core devs, but others also
> welcome to reply.

Wow. How unprofessional on so many levels!! 

Unfortunately it seems this has been picked up already by a lot of folks incl. 
I just got a press inquiry on it.
While my instinct would say just remove it, I think it’s not an option anymore. 
I think we need to write something very short and sweet that has zero opinion 
and only fact and post it instead.

Andi


--
PHP Webmaster List Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to