On 14 November 2014 14:54, Hannes Magnusson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Adam Harvey <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 13 November 2014 05:37, Thomas Hruska <[email protected]> wrote: >> > So what is the policy for moving EOL'ed versions to the archive, >> > including >> > removing the binaries for Windows? If there isn't a policy, I'm in >> > favor of >> > something like "when the announcement about EOL falls off the front >> > page" or >> > "3 months after EOL" - or both if accompanied with a phrase like >> > "whichever >> > comes first" or "whichever comes later". >> >> We don't have one — I remember that we talked about this when 5.3 was >> getting close to EOL (and, unfortunately, can't find the conversation >> now, nor even remember if it was via e-mail or IRC), but I don't think >> anything concrete came out of that besides "we'll keep it for now and >> assess the situation as we go". >> >> EOL +3 months seems like a fairly sensible guideline to me, in which >> case we hit that tomorrow for 5.3. Any objections to my removing 5.3 >> from the home and downloads pages tomorrow? >> > > > #fail > > Remove it.
It's gone. Adam -- PHP Webmaster List Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
