On 27 Jan 2015 12:35, "Ferenc Kovacs" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Stelian Mocanita <
[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Not entirely sure about the status of that to be honest, in theory we
>> should.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Hannes Magnusson <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Didn't we have a patch to use joind.in already?
>> > How about just merging that and be done with this? :/
>> >
>> > -Hannes
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Stelian Mocanita
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > Hello everyone,
>> > >
>> > > Even though we clearly state that "conference submissions should be
>> > emailed
>> > > to [email protected]" there are still a couple of
conferences
>> > > making their way into the events.
>> > >
>> > > I would propose adding an event type "Conference" to the drop down
and
>> > > trigger an error on submission for that event type, to avoid the case
>> > where
>> > > people do not read the first paragraph.
>> > >
>> > > What do you think?

I'm here and willing to continue solving problems with code. We need to
have a discussion on what we consider blocker issues and other ones that
are not so serious. Then I can write the code to make it happen. Coding is
the easy part :-)

Let's pull Lorna in on this again.

>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > > Stelian
>> >
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not really up-to-date with the discussion, but AFAIR Paul was working
on the joind.in integration and I have two issues which I don't remember
what was the consensus on:
> 1, making joind.in mandatory for listing a conference would make us lose
some confs (where the conf doesn't want to use joind.in, like ConFoo)
> 2, we would still need some kind of approval/moderation system, otherwise
anybody can just add the phpdotnet(or whatever else we decide to use) tag
to their conference, and we can't do anything about that on joind.in. there
was a mention that at least joind.in has a full-time moderation team, so
the turnaround time for reports could be still better what we have now.
>
>
>
> --
> Ferenc Kovács
> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

Reply via email to