On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Philip Olson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Dec 22, 2017, at 7:21 AM, Levi Morrison <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Philip Olson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Commit:    9eb060965d4bbd1ca401f0adace36c0616b96b3e
>>> Author:    Philip Olson <[email protected]>         Thu, 21 Dec 2017 
>>> 19:21:55 -0800
>>> Parents:   86580c9a4be551588ae77de1e51a81c247bfebca
>>> Branches:  master
>>>
>>> Link:       
>>> http://git.php.net/?p=web/php.git;a=commitdiff;h=9eb060965d4bbd1ca401f0adace36c0616b96b3e
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> Mentioned that code must work with PHP 5.3
>>>
>>> Changed paths:
>>>  M  README.md
>>>
>>>
>>> Diff:
>>> diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
>>> index add3938..113c89a 100644
>>> --- a/README.md
>>> +++ b/README.md
>>> @@ -22,4 +22,7 @@ operation of this website, such as
>>>
>>> To install a full official mirror please see [the mirroring 
>>> guidelines](http://php.net/mirroring).
>>>
>>> +## Code requirements
>>>
>>> +Code must function on a vanilla PHP 5.3 installation as some php.net 
>>> mirrors still run PHP 5.3.
>>> +Please keep this in mind before filing a pull request.
>>
>> I'd propose we move all infrastructure to version 5.5 or newer - with
>> PHP 5.5 and 7.0 being allowed only if the distribution they run is
>> supporting it - within the next few months. This is not just a "let's
>> modernize!" push; I suspect these out-of-date versions of PHP are not
>> being updated with security patches. For instance
>> 5.3.10 is used by a few mirrors but I'm not aware of any OS's
>> maintaining that version.
>
> Hi Levi,
>
> That sounds good although I'm an old timer that's not around much these days 
> but the php.net infrastructure feels fragile on several levels.
>
> As for your proposed and fully understandable requirement, that'd immediately 
> eliminate about half of the mirrors. Worse yet, master.php.net itself is 
> running 5.4.11-dev which must be a security risk. That said, I also think 
> it'd be worth requiring 5.5 or newer. Or maybe finding a single company to 
> sponsor/manage/host _all_ of this is another option?
>
> Regards,
> Philip
>
>

We should probably make an application container and move to a
container orchestration toolchain. Then we can update all mirrors
ourselves. I am allocating my time elsewhere right now, though, so
it's definitely a wishlist.

Using a single company seems unlikely. Can they provide the same
world-wide reliability we generally provide now? And if they can that
can't be cheap, so I doubt they would donate so much.

Levi Morrison

--
PHP Webmaster List Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to