php-windows Digest 6 Apr 2011 16:54:47 -0000 Issue 3941
Topics (messages 30603 through 30604):
Re: error message appears "cannot find php_oci8.dll"
30603 by: Pierre Joye
Re: [PHP] Which versions of Apache will PHP 5.3.6 work with??
30604 by: Logan L
Administrivia:
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
php-windows-digest-subscr...@lists.php.net
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
php-windows-digest-unsubscr...@lists.php.net
To post to the list, e-mail:
php-wind...@lists.php.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Begin Message ---
that's totally unrelated. His problem is a basic installation issue.
Either the OCI client is missing or he is loading the wrong version
(11G in 5.3 requires version 11).
A wrong ISAPI would give a different error, like "this module is built
for xyz but foo is used" API error check.
Cheers,
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Kris Craig <kris.cr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Have you tried running PHP as a FastCGI module instead of ISAPI? I'm not
> sure if it's still performing better or not, but at very least it is a lot
> easier to setup.
>
>
> --Kris
>
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
It might be ok with the security guys if the builds were released as
official builds from the ASF courtesy of the apachelounge.
I agree for personal development use, apachelounge might be ok. I have used
them for local development in the past and was happy with them.
I think many companies will need some sort of industry support (an
accredited organization like the ASF) behind the binaries. They can't come
from some dude's website for web server enthusiasts. That level of risk is
not acceptable.
I talked to Zend and their PHP 5.3 versions of Zend Server include a VC9
compiled Apache, so that may be the direction we go. We are exploring our
other options as well. Thanks for all the good info!
-Logan
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Logan L <li...@llbbl.com> wrote:
>
> > From a security perspective, using the ApacheLounge binaries is not an
> > option for us. It is too dependent on one person whom is not directly
> > associated with the ASF.
>
> Many other projects are moving to VC9 builds as well. For example
> easyphp moved to VC9 already. Other will follow shortly. If you expect
> the ASF to do any move any time soon, then you will be disappointed.
>
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Pierre
>
> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
>
--- End Message ---
