php-windows Digest 12 Sep 2013 09:20:41 -0000 Issue 4152
Topics (messages 31175 through 31177):
Apache or IIS???
31175 by: Jorge Hernandez
31176 by: bruno.chalopin.fr
win32service on php 5.4
31177 by: Momchil Bozhinov
Administrivia:
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
php-windows-digest-subscr...@lists.php.net
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
php-windows-digest-unsubscr...@lists.php.net
To post to the list, e-mail:
php-wind...@lists.php.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Begin Message ---
Hey guys,
Has anybody run this test, I'm in the middle of it and have found that
PHP runs faster as CGI-nts (IIS) than Module-ts (Apache), as per
Windows Server 2008 R2 running PHP 5.5.3 x64 with Apache 2.4 x64 I was
getting benchmarks of over 15 secs, I just ran the same benchmark on
Windows Server 2012 x64 and Apache 2.4 x64 with PHP 5.5.3 x64 and got
this:
PHP version : 5.5.3
Platform : WINNT
--------------------------------------
test_math : 1.093 sec.
test_stringmanipulation : 2.106 sec.
test_loops : 0.772 sec.
test_ifelse : 0.477 sec.
--------------------------------------
Total time: : 4.448 sec.
This doesn't make sense to me:
Win 2008 R2 + Apache 2.4 x64 => over 15 seconds for the total time of benchmark
Win 2012 + Apache 2.4 x64 => less than 5 secs
If both servers are using the same Apache and the same PHP, shouldn't
they be similar?
Also, when I tried CGI over Apache I got 3.x seconds which tells me
that it should run faster on IIS (CGI-nts)
Or:
PHP NTS (for IIS) runs faster than TS (For Apache) even though Apache
has always been the main server for PHP.
Any ideas?
--
Jorge Hernandez
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Le 10 sept. 2013 à 19:15, Jorge Hernandez <jfh...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hey guys,
>
> Has anybody run this test, I'm in the middle of it and have found that
> PHP runs faster as CGI-nts (IIS) than Module-ts (Apache), as per
> Windows Server 2008 R2 running PHP 5.5.3 x64 with Apache 2.4 x64 I was
> getting benchmarks of over 15 secs, I just ran the same benchmark on
> Windows Server 2012 x64 and Apache 2.4 x64 with PHP 5.5.3 x64 and got
> this:
>
> PHP version : 5.5.3
> Platform : WINNT
> --------------------------------------
> test_math : 1.093 sec.
> test_stringmanipulation : 2.106 sec.
> test_loops : 0.772 sec.
> test_ifelse : 0.477 sec.
> --------------------------------------
> Total time: : 4.448 sec.
>
> This doesn't make sense to me:
>
> Win 2008 R2 + Apache 2.4 x64 => over 15 seconds for the total time of
> benchmark
> Win 2012 + Apache 2.4 x64 => less than 5 secs
>
> If both servers are using the same Apache and the same PHP, shouldn't
> they be similar?
>
> Also, when I tried CGI over Apache I got 3.x seconds which tells me
> that it should run faster on IIS (CGI-nts)
>
> Or:
>
> PHP NTS (for IIS) runs faster than TS (For Apache) even though Apache
> has always been the main server for PHP.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> --
>
> Jorge Hernandez
Hi,
As far as I know NTS version will always be faster than TS ones as handling the
safety of thrreads require more treatments.
Now I can't explain this difference between 2012 and 2008. perhaps 2012 is
highly optimized ;-)
Btw, on all bench i've made so far, IIS is always faster and more stable than
apache on windows. (On heavy load tests I easily crash apache where IIS is fine)
Regards,
Bruno
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
I'm trying to migrate from 5.3 to 5.4, but I hit a road block
I'm using this
ext:http://windows.php.net/downloads/pecl/releases/win32service/0.1.0/
According to the
documentation:http://www.php.net/manual/bg/win32service.constants.php
This one should exist:
WIN32_ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED
but I get this:Notice: Use of undefined constant
WIN32_ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED - assumed 'WIN32_ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED'
in C:\xxx\win32_service.php on line 70
Unfortunately none of the example code works
either:http://www.php.net/manual/bg/function.win32-set-service-status.php
The service won't start even after I replace WIN32_ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED
with WIN32_SERVICE_RUNNING
Can anyone please test this ?
ThanksMomchil
--- End Message ---
