> Hi,
>
> > I think there are cases where it make more sense to start a chapter with
> > certain functions. Like it does make sense for swf_openfile() to be
first
> > since that function needs to be called before any others. So perhaps
> > open/close can be first. But it appears that the rest are in a
> > semi-random order which makes it hard to find things.
>
> I reviewed the swf function list, and I think the list has been ordered
> in sensible way (Hughes, can you confirm?) :
>
Well *I* think its sensible, but then again, I wrote it, so that would make
sense ;-)
Actually, it's ordered in the manner Rasmus describes would make sense
(besides alphabetical), for example,
swf_startdoaction()
// ... All of the action functions
swf_enddoaction()
etc.
Its the same way the libswf documentation is organized.
> I feel that alphabetical order on the whole will confuse the doc a bit.
> However, ordering within those "sections" may be interesting.
> Is that your point?
>
That would be a good idea...
> BTW, with such a numer of function, it might need another level, or
> some separators, which will clarify. Is it possible to do so?
>
I agree, that would be cool, is it possible? anyone?
-Sterling
