le 26/06/01 16:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] à [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>> So, I'm still in favor of <constant>. Thats 1 contra, 1 pro.
>
> I'm against, so that makes 2 contra, 1 pro
I'm against it too. Most of docs already use <literal> and
I think Goba's right with TRUE not being a constant anymore.
I would like to point out that spotting all True/FALse occurrences
and turning them into tagged version would bring consistancy to
docs, which is far beyond turning all literal -> constant.
My two eurocents, for what's worth of it.
Damien Seguy
