Hi!
Hi!
Thanks for the explanation, didn't know this cvs-feature.
This sounds very good, as it saves a second commit in the translators.
But the bigger task would be reach out the message (We had this
"version-issue" for Germans already, and also Egon seemed to agree
in his message from 01-04-24 09:45, what seems to have changed now).
If there is a common agreement to it for all langs, it would be nice to have
some kind of an automatic reminder, for which I don't have any idea how
to implement (because everybody can forget it :).
--Thomas
Jeroen Van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Hi Jeroen,
> >
> > thanks for this answer, and I also didn't doubt that he's really
> > ready (NOW, but not in half a year, if he has to go to the hospital
> > tomorrow).
>
> We're on the same line.
>
> > > Even better, IMO, is to include the en-version as a comment in the xml
> file
> > > itself.
> > >
> > > What about a $Revision: $ comment in all english files?
> >
> > Don't think that I got you right:
> >
> > Could you please explain it again (esp. the 2nd sentence)?
>
> Of course, what I mean with the FIRST line is like the first lines of
>
> phpdoc/nl/language/basis-syntax.xml:
> <!-- up-to-date against phpdoc/en/language/basic-syntax.xml:1.3 -->
> <chapter id="language.basic-syntax">
> <title>Basis syntax</title>
>
> And with the second line:
>
> phpdoc/en/language/basic-syntax.xml: (virtual ;)
> <!-- This file is in revision $Revision 1.41 $ --> // this updates
> automagically on each cvs commit
> <chapter ...
>
> This way you can see in the file itself which revision it is, you don't need
> to look at CVS/Entries or cvs.php.net or something. I think it's useful (for
> en-only, that is)
>
> --Jeroen
