>> So the DocBook docs says, one common result is "void".
>> Then we can implement it for this tag to print void.
>> As <void/> is the best syntax according to docbook,
>> there is no need to revert the changes, it would
>> be a step backward. We should go one step further,
>> and look into how the void word can be printed
>> with DSSSL IMHO.
>
>It was not posible the last 5 years, so I don't see to change
>the manual in that direction.
What was not possible? I must miss something.
>What is your problem with that? The syntax <void/> was
>not used in the documentation.
This is the time, we start using it.
>This doesn't mean, we should not improve our XML files, but to
>change all <parameter>void</parameter> to <void/> is the wrong direction.
So the DocBook man says <void/> is the right syntax to express that
a function has no arguments, right?. We used <parameter>void</parameter>
for the same purpouse. So this was wrong according to the DocBook
manual. We can agree on this I think.
Then we are trying to change to the right way, and the only
problem is that the DSSSL style sheets are not supporting
this syntax with printing out (void), as you would like to see it.
Now I have changed the DSSSL style sheet to print out (void).
This way we are using the right DocBook tag, and we print out
what you would like to see.
Then why this is the wrong direction?
Goba
