> Can be done without any hurry before the change:
> - Modify the *.dsl files so that TOC is created the right way. Some small
> fixing with HTML version, a bit more with printable versions. I will
> volunteer, unless Hartmut explicitly requests to have the honour...
> - New subtitles must be agreed on and added to each language-defs.ent.
This is what needs to be the same for the bug system. So if it is
not right, we should collect the functions and make a new category
system, and start to use it in the bug system and here too.
> - I guess that some scripts relating to the online HTML-manual should
> be fixed. Not sure though.
As long as we can get the file names stay the same, there is
nothing [I can think of] to modify in the scripts at phpweb.
The notes are binded by file names, so this is why the file
names are important for us.
> - Probably more...
Erm, if we start to change things in a way like that, we can
also start paralelly on proofing the "split up the function
reference by functions into files" plan. This was a great plan
IMHO, and [if we can agree in both cases] we should make the
two changes the same time, instead of two separate
repository-wide changes.
> Can be done only after the re-organization, and with great hurry, because
> the change will temporarily break a lot of things:
> - Change the tags, and within <abstract>, add <para> tags around <note>s
> and <warning>s and change <simpara>s to <para>s, because the DTD
> requires this.
Maybe somebody can write scripts for these tasks, and test
if they are working well (a good place for these scripts is
the scripts dir under phpweb :). [See the readme there].
> Comments?
I think the ideas are OK, and we can go on discuss this.
I am against nothing with this plan this time.
Goba
